Introduction:Serotonin and sympathomimetic toxicity (SST) after ingestion of amphetamine-based drugs can lead to severe morbidity and death. There have been evaluations of the safety and efficacy of on-site treatment protocols for SST at music festivals.Problem:The study aimed to examine the safety and efficacy of treating patients with SST on-site at a music festival using a protocol adapted from hospital-based treatment of SST.Methods:The study is an audit of presentations with SST over a one-year period. The primary outcome was need for ambulance transport to hospital. The threshold for safety was prospectively defined as less than 10% of patients requiring ambulance transport to hospital.The protocol suggested patients be treated with a combination of benzodiazepines; cold intravenous (IV) fluid; specific therapies (cyproheptadine, chlorpromazine, and clonidine); rapid sequence intubation; and cooling with ice, misted water, and convection techniques.Results:One patient of 13 (7.7%) patients with mild or moderate SST required ambulance transport to hospital. Two of seven further patients with severe SST required transport to hospital.Conclusions:On-site treatment may be a safe, efficacious, and efficient alternative to urgent transport to hospital for patients with mild and moderate SST. The keys to success of the protocol tested included inclusive and clear education of staff at all levels of the organization, robust referral pathways to senior clinical staff, and the rapid delivery of therapies aimed at rapidly lowering body temperature. Further collaborative research is required to define the optimal approach to patients with SST at music festivals.

Lifesavers using the PM and BVM perform ventilation for cardiopulmonary resuscitation well. There appears to be a limited role for supraglottic airway devices because of limitations in terms of time to first effective ventilation and reliability. Clinical validation of manikin data with live resuscitation performance is required.

Objective This study aimed to determine if pulse oximetry could reliably be used after immersion in water, and if so, which of the finger, earlobe or nose most reliably produced a functional waveform. Method Pulse oximetry data was recorded from the ear, nose and finger before and after 30 min of immersion in water. The primary outcome was the ability to measure pulse oximetry at any of the sites. Results A total of 119 participants were enrolled (with a median age of 16 years, 55% male). A useful pulse oximetry waveform was obtained after immersion from at least one of the measurement sites in 118 (99.2%) participants. Waveforms were usable after immersion in 96% of participants at the nostril, compared to 92% at the finger, and 41% at the ear lobe. The likelihood of success at the ear was significantly lower than either the finger or the nose (41% vs 92% and 96% respectively, p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). The finger and nostril were similar. Oxygen saturations were not significantly different after immersion at the nostril (100% vs 100%, p = 0.537) and finger (100% vs 100%, p = 0.032) sites but were different at the ear (100% vs 96%, p < 0.0001). Conclusion This study demonstrates that pulse oximetry is feasible and reliable in a large cohort of participants who have been immersed in water for 30 min. The results support the nostril as the most reliable location. Only pulse oximeters registered for clinical use should be employed for patient care.

Immersion of patients in a body bag filled with ice and water is recommended as prehospital management of severe hyperthermia. Experienced paramedics have raised a number of concerns about the use of this technique; particularly, whether cardiac monitoring equipment would remain functional once immersed. This test showed that monitoring equipment does remain functional and provides advice about safety considerations. The test should reassure practitioners that such an approach is feasible.