The Idylla platform is an interesting ancillary first-line fast and fully automated tool to detect and mutations in NSCLC samples allowing rapid treatment choices in patients with acute deterioration.

BRAF and NRAS genetic analyses are time-consuming and can delay treatment choices in patients with metastatic melanomas presenting with acute deterioration. We compared the rapid, real-time, fully automated molecular diagnosis platform Idylla™ with next-generation sequencing (NGS) and immunohistochemistry for detection of BRAF and NRAS mutations in 36 patients with metastatic melanomas. The Idylla™ NRAS-BRAF-EGFRS492R mutation assay (110 min per sample) detected BRAF and NRAS mutations in 15 and 17 samples, respectively. One NRAS mutation was different between NGS and Idylla™ (NRASG13C vs. NRASG12A/D). Four samples were BRAF and NRAS wild-type. The global concordance between NGS and Idylla™ assays was 97.2% (35/36 cases). Immunohistochemistry was positive only in 9/9 BRAFV600E- and 6/6 NRASQ61R-mutated samples with VE1 and SP174 antibodies, respectively. The Idylla™ platform is a valuable rapid molecular diagnosis tool to reduce the delay in BRAF and NRAS analyses-related treatment choices for patients with metastatic melanoma presenting with acute deterioration.

Anti‐TRK targeted therapies offer opportunities to treat patients with advanced NTRK1/2/3‐rearranged cancers. Beyond NTRK‐rearranged secretory breast carcinomas, little is known about NTRK rearrangements and the expression of TRK proteins in non‐secretory breast carcinomas. We search for TRK proteins expressions using pan‐TRK immunohistochemistry and NTRK1, NTRK2 and NTRK3 rearrangements using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) tests in a set of tissue microarray included breast carcinomas. Only 1/339 invasive breast carcinomas, the only example of secretory subtype, was positive using pan‐TRK immunohistochemistry and harboured a NTRK‐rearrangement (NTRK1 positive FISH test). According to our results, druggable NTRK rearrangements and related‐TRK proteins expression are not encountered in non‐secretory breast carcinomas.

No abstract

ALK inhibitors have improved the therapeutic management of patients with ALK-rearranged advanced non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). Several diagnostic methods, mainly fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC), can be used as single or combined tests to detect the so-called “ALK-positive” NSCLC. Intersample and intermethod discrepancies could cause issues with therapeutic consequences in ALK testing. In this article, we report a case series of our real-life experience and issues in combining FISH and IHC in multiple tumor samples per patient to diagnose and treat a subset of “ALK-positive” patients with NSCLC. Among analyses conducted in 40 samples of 18 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas, we retrospectively encountered 10 patients with intersample-concordant ALK FISH and IHC results. Discrepant results about FISH and/or IHC were noted between different samples in 8 patients. Therapeutic responses were observed in 5 of 10 crizotinib-treated patients including 1 patient with ALK FISH+ IHC− status and 1 patient with ALK FISH− IHC+ status. Our data highlight the difficulty to predict the response/nonresponse to crizotinib therapy, in patients with advanced NSCLC, not only on the basis of single and multiple tumor samples, but also on the basis of single and combined diagnostic methods.