SummaryCardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has become an established adjunctive treatment to optimal pharmacologic therapy in patients with advanced chronic heart failure (CHF), diminished left ventricular (LV) function and intraventricular conduction delay. Although CRT has been shown to improve ventricular hemodynamics, quality of life and exercise capacity, there is some evidence that it may rarely potentiate ventricular arrhythmias. As CRT is considered for an expanded population of CHF patients, and left-sided pacing is considered as an option for pacemaker-indicated patients (potentially without defibrillator backup), the effect of these pacing modalities on the incidence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia must be systematically studied and mechanistically understood. Strategies to prospectively predict the proarrhythmic potential of LV epicardial pacing need to be developed, and therapy accordingly individualized. This review attempts to summarize the current information on proarrhythmia in resynchronization therapy.

This analysis of MOMENTUM 3 suggests that younger age (≤65 years) at implant and pump choice are associated with a greater likelihood of primary end-point success. These findings further suggest that characterization of therapeutic intent into discrete bridge-to-transplant and destination therapy categories offers no clear clinical advantage, and should ideally be abandoned.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract