Prostate cancer is the second cause of cancer-related death in men of the Western World. The role of FGFR3 and its abnormalities in prostate cancer are not known. FGFR3 mutations have been reported in some human tumors. Few studies have analyzed the mutations of FGFR3 in prostate tumors, and no mutations have been previously reported. Prevalence of FGFR3 somatic mutations was investigated in a series of prostate tumors. The presence of other tumors in these patients, including urothelial, skin, colon, and lung neoplasms, was recorded. Mutational analysis of exons 7, 10, and 15 of FGFR3 revealed 9 mutations in the 112 prostate tumors studied (8%). Most of them consisted of the missense change S249C. The prevalence of mutations in tumors with combined Gleason score ¼ 6 is 18% (8/45) compared to 3% (1/36) for tumors with grade ¼ 7, and 0% (0/31) for those with grade Z8 and metastases (P ¼ 0.007). The frequency of FGFR3 mutations in autopsy and biopsy samples was 6 and 9%, respectively. The prevalence of FGFR3 mutations in prostate tumors from patients with only prostate cancer was 2% compared to 23% in prostate tumors from patients with other associated neoplasms (P ¼ 0.001). This is the first report of molecular changes of FGFR3 in prostate cancer. This gene does not seem to be central to the pathogenesis of prostate cancer, but it is significantly associated with a subgroup of low-grade prostate tumors, and with the finding of other tumors, mainly arising in bladder and skin.

No abstract

The main challenge for clinical management of prostate cancer is to distinguish tumors that will progress faster and will show a higher tendency to recur from the more indolent ones. We have compared expression profiles of 18 prostate cancer samples (seven with a Gleason score of 6, eight with a Gleason score of 7, and three with a Gleason score of ≥8) and five nonneoplastic prostate samples, using the Affymetrix Human Array GeneChip Exon 1.0 ST. Microarray analysis revealed 99 genes showing statistically significant differences among tumors with Gleason scores of 6, 7, and ≥8. In addition, mRNA expression of 29 selected genes was analyzed by real-time quantitative RT-PCR with microfluidic cards in an extended series of 30 prostate tumors. Of the 29 genes, 18 (62%) were independently confirmed in the extended series by quantitative RT-PCR: 14 were up-regulated and 4 were down-regulated in tumors with a higher Gleason score. Twelve of these genes were differentially expressed in tumors with a Gleason score of 6 to 7 versus ≥8. Finally, IHC validation of the protein levels of two genes from the 12-gene signature (SEC14L1 and TCEB1) showed strong protein expression levels of both genes, which were statistically associated with a high combined Gleason score, advanced stage, and prostate-specific antigen progression. This set of genes may contribute to a better understanding of the molecular basis of prostate cancer. TCEB1 and SELC14L1 are good candidate markers for predicting prognosis and progression of prostate cancer.