Malaria and typhoid fever are debilitating diseases responsible for the deaths of thousands of lives annually. Over the last decade both diseases have received increasing attention with particular focus on malaria. However, recent reports indicate an increasing co-infection rate between malaria and typhoid fever. Familiar signs and symptoms of both diseases have led to the belief in some communities that it's a new disease. In this study, we investigated the relationship between malaria and typhi O and H antigens among patients reporting with fever. Patients reporting with fever from April 2013-March 2014 were recruited for the study. Our results showed that there was no association between having malaria and typhoid fever infection. However, having fever was associated with having both diseases. Also, fever among patients was more likely to be caused by Salmonella typhi O and H antigens than plasmodium parasites. Infections of both diseases were higher in wet season than in dry season. The study recommends that malaria and typhoid fever intervention programs are increased in endemic areas. Also attention should be paid to typhoid fever infection rates in the country.

Clinicians regularly assess, diagnose and manage illnesses which are directly or indirectly linked to environmental exposures. Yet, various studies have identified gaps in environmental assessment in routine clinical practice. This review assessed clinicians’ environmental health practices, attitudes and beliefs, and competencies and training. Relevant articles were sought using a systematic search strategy using five databases, grey literature and a hand search. Search strategies and protocols were developed using tailored mesh terms and keywords. 43 out of 11,291 articles were eligible for inclusion. Clinicians’ attitudes and beliefs towards environmental health and routine clinical practice were generally positive, with most clinicians believing that environmental hazards affect human health. However, with the exception of tobacco smoke exposure, environmental health assessment was infrequently part of routine clinical practice. Clinicians’ self-competence in environmental assessment was reported to be inadequate. Major challenges were the time required to complete an assessment, inadequate training and concerns about negative patients’ responses. Clinicians have strong positive attitudes and beliefs about the importance of environmental health assessments. However, more concerted and robust strategies will be needed to support clinicians in assuming their assessment and counselling roles related to a wider range of environmental hazards.

It is common knowledge that soils irrigated with wastewater accumulate heavy metals more than those irrigated with cleaner water sources. However, little is known on metal concentrations in soils and cultivars after the cessation of wastewater use. This study assessed the accumulation and health risk of heavy metals 3 years post-wastewater irrigation in soils, vegetables, and farmers' hair. Soils, vegetables, and hair samples were collected from villages previously irrigating with wastewater (experimental villages) and villages with no history of wastewater irrigation (control villages). Soil samples were digested in a mixture of HCL/HNO3/HCLO4/HF. Plants and hair samples were digested in HNO3/HCLO4 mixture. Inductive coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES) was used to determine metal concentrations of digested extracts. Study results indicate a persistence of heavy metal concentration in soils and plants from farms previously irrigated with wastewater. In addition, soils previously irrigated with wastewater were severely contaminated with cadmium. Hair metal concentrations of farmers previously irrigating with wastewater were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than farmers irrigating with clean water, but metal concentrations in hair samples of farmers previously irrigating with wastewater were not associated with current soil metal concentrations. The study concludes that there is a persistence of heavy metals in soils and plants previously irrigated with wastewater, but high metal concentrations in hair samples of farmers cannot be associated with current soil metal concentrations.

The study investigated the age-adjusted mortality rate and disease odds among deceased residents living in areas exposed to wastewater and cleanwater from 2007 to 2011, in Shijiazhuang, China. Mortality data for eight villages exposed to wastewater and 16 villages not exposed to wastewater were collected and crosschecked from multiple sources. Overall mean age-adjusted mortality rate for wastewater areas was 798/105 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) = ± 68), insignificantly higher than the mean mortality rate for cleanwater area, 726/105 (95% CI = ± 46), p > 0.05. Malignant neoplasms and respiratory mortality and disease odds were higher in wastewater areas than in cleanwater areas, OR = 1.7 (95% CI = 1.3-2.2, p < 0.01) and OR = 1.9 (95% CI = 1.1-3.4, p < 0.05), respectively. Wastewater area mortality and disease odds for Lung and Stomach cancers after adjustments were OR = 1.6 (95% CI = 1.1-2.4, p < 0.05) and OR = 1.8 (95% CI = 1.2-2.7, p < 0.01), respectively, significantly higher than those of cleanwater areas. There is a possibility that exposure to wastewater might be associated with cancer and respiratory disease mortality. The study recommends that the use of wastewater be limited, discouraged, or discontinued.