SignificancePlants and animals carry intracellular nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) immune receptors. How NLR receptors activate defense on perceiving pathogen molecules is poorly understood, especially in plants. Some NLRs function in pairs, with one NLR carrying a domain that mimics a pathogen effector target. Effector action on this domain activates the second “helper” NLR. In the Arabidopsis RPS4 and RRS1 pair, RRS1 carries a WRKY transcription factor domain targeted by bacterial effectors AvrRps4 and PopP2. We monitored conformational changes in RPS4–RRS1 during activation and developed a “molecular padlock” to reversibly restrict such changes. This revealed domains within RRS1 required to keep the RRS1–RPS4 complex inactive prior to effector detection, and specific domain–domain interactions whose disruption or modification contributes to defense activation.

Plant and animal intracellular nucleotide-binding, leucine-rich repeat (NLR) immune receptors detect pathogen-derived molecules and activate defense. Plant NLRs can be divided into several classes based upon their N-terminal signaling domains, including TIR (Toll-like, Interleukin-1 receptor, Resistance protein)- and CC (coiled-coil)-NLRs. Upon ligand detection, mammalian NAIP and NLRC4 NLRs oligomerize, forming an inflammasome that induces proximity of its N-terminal signaling domains. Recently, a plant CC-NLR was revealed to form an inflammasome-like hetero-oligomer. To further investigate plant NLR signaling mechanisms, we fused the N-terminal TIR domain of several plant NLRs to the N terminus of NLRC4. Inflammasome-dependent induced proximity of the TIR domain in planta initiated defense signaling. Thus, induced proximity of a plant TIR domain imposed by oligomerization of a mammalian inflammasome is sufficient to activate authentic plant defense. Ligand detection and inflammasome formation is maintained when the known components of the NLRC4 inflammasome is transferred across kingdoms, indicating that NLRC4 complex can robustly function without any additional mammalian proteins. Additionally, we found NADase activity of a plant TIR domain is necessary for plant defense activation, but NADase activity of a mammalian or a bacterial TIR is not sufficient to activate defense in plants.

Plant age is a crucial factor in determining the outcome of a host−pathogen interaction. In successive developmental stages throughout their life cycles, plants face dynamic changes in biotic and abiotic conditions that create distinct ecological niches for host−pathogen interactions. As an adaptive strategy, plants have evolved intrinsic regulatory networks that integrate developmental signals with those from pathogen perception and defense activation. As a result, amplitude and timing of defense responses are optimized, so as to balance the cost and benefit of immunity activation. A general term “age-related resistance” refers to a gain of disease resistance against a certain pathogen when plants reach a relatively mature stage. Age-related resistance is a common observation on fruits, vegetables, and row crops for their resistance against viruses, bacteria, fungi, oomycetes pathogens, and insects. This review focuses on the recent advances in understanding the molecular mechanisms of how plants coordinate developmental timing and immune response.

In plants, age-related resistance (ARR) refers to a gain of disease resistance during shoot or organ maturation. ARR associated with vegetative phase change, a transition from juvenile to adult stage, is a widespread agronomic trait affecting resistance against multiple pathogens. How innate immunity in a plant is differentially regulated during successive stages of shoot maturation is unclear. In this work, we found that Arabidopsis thaliana showed ARR against its bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 during vegetative phase change. The timing of the ARR activation was associated with a temporal drop of miR156 level. A systematic inspection of the loss- and gain-of-function mutants of 11 SPL genes revealed that a subset of SPL genes, notably SPL2, SPL10, and SPL11, activated ARR in adult stage. The immune function of SPL10 was independent of its role in morphogenesis. Furthermore, the SPL10 mediated an age-dependent augmentation of the salicylic acid (SA) pathway partially by direct activation of PAD4. Disrupting SA biosynthesis or signaling abolished the ARR against Pto DC3000. Our work demonstrated that the miR156-SPL10 module in Arabidopsis is deployed to operate immune outputs over developmental timing.