Thinner polyethylene components demonstrated higher wear rates, although even the highest wear rate observed in the thinnest polyethylene specimen was lower than that commonly reported for noncrosslinked polyethylene components. While encouraging, these findings should be validated in vivo before clinical recommendations can be made.
Steep cup abduction angles with adverse joint loading may increase traditional polyethylene bearing wear in total hip arthroplasties. However, there have been few reports evaluating the effect of cup inclination on the wear of dual-mobility devices. In a hip joint simulation, we compared the short-term wear of two-sizes of modular highly cross-linked dual-mobility bearings (28 mm femoral head diameter/42 mm polyethylene insert outer diameter/54 mm acetabular shell diameter; 22.2 mm femoral head diameter/ 36 mm polyethylene insert outer diameter/48 mm acetabular shell diameter) at 50 and 65˚of cup inclination with modular 28 mm femoral head on 54 mm cup diameter metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings. Increasing inclination from 50-65˚had no changes in volumetric wear of 28/42/54 mm (mean, 1.7 vs. 1.2 mm 3 /million cycles, respectively; p ¼ 0.50) and 22.2/36/48 mm (mean, 1.7 vs. 1.2 mm 3 /million cycles, respectively; p ¼ 0.48) dual mobility bearings. At 65˚, 22.2/36/48 mm dual-mobility bearings had lower volumetric loss (mean, 2.2 vs. 6.3 mm 3 ; p ¼ 0.03) and wear rates (mean, 1.2 vs. 2.7 mm 3 /million cycles; p ¼ 0.02) compared to metal-onhighly cross-linked polyethylene bearings. Modern-generation dual-mobility designs with highly cross-linked polyethylenes may potentially withstand edge-loading from steeper cup-inclinations without substantial decreases in wear. ß
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.