This study explores inmates' perceptions of institutional change when a Midwestern state converted a minimum-security prison to a gang-free facility. The discussion examines inmates' perspectives of the prison environment using H. Toch's 1992 eight prison environmental dimensions through focus-group interviews with three different subgroups. The first group consisted of inmates imprisoned at the facility pre- and postconversion. The second was composed of inmates transferred to the gang-free facility from other minimum-security facilities as part of the conversion. The third focus group consisted of newly admitted offenders sent directly to the facility from the correctional system's reception and classification centers. The findings suggest that two dimensions of personal control—choice and predictability—influenced inmates' acceptance of major institutional environment change. Implications for program design and institutional management are discussed.

This paper examines two identifiable infrastructure dimensions, private and public organizations and treatment and security paradigms, that must be merged for seamless or boundaryless treatment regimens to be operationalized in secure correctional environments. Three infrastructure elements are considered: goals, organizational environments, and organizational levels. Using data collected from a recent process evaluation regarding the implementation of a residential substance abuse treatment program within a secure state juvenile correctional institution, it appears that perceptual boundaries were in part established by incongruities between the public sector correctional organization and the private sector treatment provider regarding these infrastructure elements. The findings suggest that the initiation of partial mission privatization in a correctional environment, particularly as it relates to the provision of treatment services in the form of a therapeutic community, is dubious at best.A conflict between the treatment and incapacitation/punishment aspects of the imprisonment sanction has long been recognized. Indeed, the various incarceration "models" characterize deeply held philosophical positions regarding the nature and focus of the prison experience. The lack of consensus in this arena has spurred what Allen and Simonsen (2001) have referred to in their introductory correctional text as a "model muddle" (p. 372).Recently, yet another correctional model dimension, privatization, has

Malignant melanoma is the fifth most common cancer in the UK and rising. With advances in accessibility to go abroad and use sunbeds, combined with the popularity to acquire a tan, young adults' sun-related behaviours are significantly increasing their risk of skin cancer. Understanding their knowledge and attitudes towards these behaviours would be key for developing effective skin cancer prevention campaigns. While existing evidence suggests appearance and health-related motives encourage the preference for tanning over sun-protection, evidence is inconclusive on whether knowledge affects sun-related behaviours. Equally, literature on attitudes has not been qualitatively studied in-depth pertinent to UK male and female students. 15 students from a UK University were individually interviewed to explore whether their knowledge on the harms of ultraviolet radiation influences their sunrelated behaviours and to examine their attitudes towards: sun-protection, natural and artificial tanning behaviours. With thematic analysis using the Framework Method, analyst triangulation and member validation, five themes emerged. Knowledge did not strongly influence sun-related behaviours. Body image (Slade 1994) strongly motivated participants' sun-protection, natural and artificial tanning practices where implications on appearances affected selfconfidence, owing to external influences from: peers, media and family. Unrealistic optimism appeared key in governing decisions towards harmful behaviours whereas perceived susceptibility (Health Belief Model; Becker 1974) to sunburn encouraged sun-protection. Overall, attitudes towards sun-related behaviours are multi-dimensional with influences linked, indicating the diversity of potential areas to be addressed for skin-cancer prevention. Public Health strategies may benefit from appearance-related campaigns, encouraging safer parental sun-related habits and correcting sun-related misconceptions.