This article gathers together the most recent articles of adjustable tuned vibration absorbers. The tuned vibration absorber was invented over 100 years ago, and its adjustability is also already well-known. However, concentration of this review was only on articles published since the year 2000 in peer reviewed journals, except from certain elementary books and some previous review articles in order to keep up with the current events in this broad field. First a brief inspection of the theory of tuned vibration absorbers (TVAs) is presented. After that mechanical TVAs are presented more carefully. In the same chapter the following are also handled: virtual absorbers, absorbers with adjustable damping, and Helmholtz resonators. Own chapter is allocated for multiple TVAs whose idea is to replace adjustability by adding several TVAs to primary system to damp out vibrations in the wide frequency band. The review section is completed by presenting smart material TVAs, which include, e.g., piezoelectric materials, shape-memory alloys, electrorheological and magnetorheological materials of fluids. An adjustable Helmholtz resonator in a low pressure hydraulic system is presented in Sec. 5. Experiments verify the efficiency of the damping character of the adjustable Helmholtz resonator whose resonant frequency can be varied.

An adjustable Helmholtz resonator in hydraulics is studied because of obvious lack of studies in the field. First the theory of a Helmholtz resonator is reviewed by examining older studies on the subject. Most of the previous studies have covered Helmholtz resonators in acoustics, but the same basic theory can be applied to hydraulics. After the theory review the test equipment and measurement methods are presented and some results are calculated analytically using the classical model and a modified model that takes the effect of spring mass into consideration. The spring mass is taken into account because the density of hydraulic oil is over 700 times greater than the density of air. In the last section the results of the calculations and measurements are discussed, and it is noted that the results of the experiments agree better with the modified model of classical Helmholtz theory. Some explanations for residual discrepancies are given but also some remarks are presented.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract