The article attempts to comprehend the issues that arise in connection with the spread of transdisciplinary strategies.These are questions to actualize the consideration of transdisciplinarity, as a phenomenon hier-archically associated with an interdisciplinary form of human activity, which is considered as a heuristic primordial foundation of the modern stylistics of philosophizing. It clarifies, redefines, through the filter of the existential problems to be solved, the generally accepted provisions and laws of disciplinary knowledge, using the paradoxicality of the reflexive-recursive subject-object relations of postnonclassics. Political subjectivity can be considered a term in social and political philosophy that accounts for the abil-ity to introduce change in the internal and external areas of the political form. Political subjects execute power in different ways and on different levels of the multilevel governance structure. On each level po-litical subjects come into existence, develop and mature and then proceed with deconstruction. Political morphogenesis is a complex phenomenon. The main target for the closed political subjects is self-preservation as these political forms have an in-built development ceiling, whereas the main target for the open political subjects is evolution as a process that is isomorphous with the environment. Political mor-phogenesis has an interval character: it happens mostly under the circumstances of uncertainty and unpre-dictability of the political life when the political form’s old parameters of order are no longer functional while the new order parameters have not been established yet. This is the momentum when political en-trepreneurs enter the political stage — those are political subjects that extract value from uncertainty by offering a crisis management initiative that eventually leads to the empowerment of the political entrepre-neur by granting it more power and a widened authority scope.

Nowadays, the problematization of a person as an unfinished project takes place as a cross-cutting thematization of the interdisciplinary approach, which presupposes a holistic, complex study that «throws light on both the meaning of all scientific activity and the unified basis of the mechanisms of imagination operating here» (G. Holton). The article draws attention to the peculiarities of project activity, its aspiration for the possible embodiment of a community of interests in solving urgent problems. The creative complementarity of the personal and the collective as well as internal and external factors in the changing norms and values of the scientific community is reshaping the ethos of communication and understanding. The agenda includes the need to address the current ambivalence of scientific communication taking into account the response to the demands of society to work out the updated principles of assembling scientific teams based on trust and solidarity. The procreative, generative function of scientific activity is prescribed in the context of team building. The problematization of the academic community assembly is growing as it is becoming more open and accountable to society. The culture of skills of critical but empathic mutual trust in communication is actualized, this trust including the heuristics of the scientific dispute of the interest-based ethos. Repetitive successful practices of pro-creative communication can, over time, acquire the character of an institutionally formed tradition, a conventionally fixed norm of creative cooperation. The authors suggest the possibility of achieving this goal grounded not only on the primary impulse of the community of interest but on prolonged communication strategies. The basis for such an outcome is the symmetrical contribution of participants in problem-oriented scientific communication to the achievement of the collective good in the form of innovative approaches to solving fundamental problems of our time which have confirmed practical application in multiple specific cases. Convergence of expectations resulting from the emergence of trust in the ethos of the scientific community can be built «in between» behavioral choice options in the ternary matrix of «loyalty–voice–exit». The preadaptive academic activity of the group can be sustainable in the presence of «protective valves» channeling dissatisfaction with the parameters of order, renewed understanding and communication patterns in the project activity of the group.

No abstract

The situation of human editing in a variety of human activity forms requires a detailed analysis from the point of view of practical philosophy in solving the problem of the nature and the need for moral biological improvement. The latter bears the metaphorical name “human editing” and is focused in the field of philosophical problems of biology and medicine, which implicitly implies the relationship between the empirical and the theoretical. Paying attention to the procedural-phenomenological nature of this type of activity, the thought turns to the consideration of the features of transdisciplinarity experience, its foundations, ways of substantiating and validating the results obtained, taking into account primordial reflexive duality of a human, who is able to creatively combine the subjective and objective forms of mental activity, value and semantic meanings with material and objective representation in relations to oneself and external nature.Semiosis of material transformation of human activity fixes sign systems framed by extrema, in which autopoiesis and auto-correction of a person unfolds. The procreative significance of sign systems’ evolution is expressed in the phase transition from the creation of things by man to a critical juncture between the automated creation of things by things and the creation of man by man using artificial procreative technologies, including genome modification. Thepoesisof the transdisciplinary experience of human editing renews the modality of the included third, opening the loop of the fractal replication of binary oppositions by variations of personal moral choice. The ratio of human editing and community improving directly connects bioethics with politics through the normogenesis of law, with a significant time lag from the practice of technosphere formation – the time lag which explains the ontogenesis of intergenerational conflict through the categories of responsibility and direct contact of experience transmission recipients with the environment. The issue of human editing involves the collision between the existential fear of the loss of the human in a person with the heroism of a creative breakthrough in the triumph of the psychology of overcoming, making it possible to view the future of humanity from the standpoint of evolutionary optimism.

В статье рассмотрены проблемные узлы исследования, посвященного современным тенденциям развития антропологического знания, имеющего междисциплинарную направленность. Ключевую роль в этом направлении играет термин «прокреация», его концептуализация проходит на фоне становления социокультурных норм при усложнении соотношения фундаментальных и прикладных аспектов воспроизводства деторождения с помощью ВРТ. Междисциплинарность, как подтверждает проводимое исследование, имеет позитивную направленность в своих решениях, если параллельно идет формирование словаря (тезауруса), тематически ориентированного на дискурсивные практики проекта.