BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Delayed cord clamping (DCC) is recommended for premature infants to improve blood volume. Most preterm infants are born by cesarean delivery (CD), and placental transfusion may be less effective than in vaginal delivery (VD). We sought to determine whether infants ,32 weeks born by CD who undergo umbilical cord milking (UCM) have higher measures of systemic blood flow than infants who undergo DCC.
A serum-based molecular predictor identifies asymptomatic pregnant women at risk of spontaneous preterm delivery, which may provide utility in identifying women at risk at an early stage of pregnancy to allow for clinical intervention. This early detection would guide enhanced levels of care and accelerate development of clinical strategies to prevent preterm delivery.
Objective
To assess whether providing ventilation during delayed cord clamping (V-DCC) increases placental transfusion compared with delayed cord clamping alone (DCC only).
Study design
Inborn premature infants (230-316 week gestational age) were randomized to receive at least 60 seconds of delayed cord clamping with ventilation (V-DCC: initial continuous positive airway pressure [CPAP]) with addition of positive pressure ventilation if needed) or without assisted ventilation (DCC only). For the DCC only group, infants were dried and stimulated by gently rubbing the back if apneic. The primary outcome was the peak hematocrit in the first 24 hours of life. Delivery room outcomes were analyzed from video recordings and a data acquisition system. Hemodynamic measurements were performed using functional echocardiography (fECHO), near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), and electrical cardiometry (EC).
Results
There was no difference in the primary outcome of peak hematocrit in the first 24 hours of life. The onset of breathing was similar between both groups (25±20 and 27±28 seconds, p=0.627). However, infants receiving DCC received a greater duration of stimulation than VDCC (41±19 and 20±21 seconds p=0.002). There were no differences in delivery room interventions, early hemodynamics (cerebral oxygenation by NIRS, cardiac output and stroke volume by EC, or superior vena cava flow by fECHO) or neonatal outcomes.
Conclusions
Ventilation during delayed cord clamping was feasible but did not lead to any measurable clinical improvements immediately after delivery or reduce subsequent neonatal morbidity. Caretakers should consider providing adequate stimulation prior to cord clamping.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02231411
The purpose of this study was to compare the AmniSure rapid immunoassay with standard methods for diagnosing rupture of fetal membranes. Patients presenting with signs/symptoms of membrane rupture between 15 and 42 weeks of gestation were invited to participate. Standard/control methods were performed to establish a diagnosis and compare it with AmniSure results. AmniSure performance metrics and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated. A total of 203 patients agreed to participate. Discrepancies between the control method and AmniSure were noted in seven cases. In these cases, true positives and negatives were determined by retesting with the control method and AmniSure and by noting sonographic evidence of low amniotic fluid. In the final analysis, the AmniSure diagnostic test demonstrated a sensitivity of 98.9%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 99.1%. AmniSure is highly accurate in diagnosing fetal membrane rupture.
Acute RDS occurs more frequently in pregnancy than the 1.5 cases per 100,000 per year reported for the general population. Prolonged ventilator support is warranted. The high rate of perinatal asphyxia in infants who have fetal heart rate abnormalities supports a strategy of expeditious delivery during the third trimester.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.