Objective To determine predictors of efficacy for cervical ripening among the Bishop score criteria in nulliparous women at term. Method Prospective observational study of nulliparous women with singleton term fetuses in vertex presentation, intact membranes, and an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score < 6) who underwent cervical ripening with a cervical‐ripening balloon (CRB; n = 47) or dinoprostone vaginal insert (PG; n = 28). The authors analyzed Bishop score criteria (dilatation, effacement, fetal station, consistency, position) before and after device removal. Primary outcome was favorable cervix (Bishop score ≥ 6) after device removal. Secondary outcomes were vaginal delivery, modification of Bishop score criteria, and perinatal morbidity. Results Rates of favorable cervix after cervical ripening were similar between groups (66.7% with CRB vs. 59.3% with PG; P = 0.526). Vaginal delivery (76.6% vs. 78.6%; P = 0.843) and perinatal morbidity did not differ between groups. CRB appeared to be more effective than PG in increasing consistency (+0.7 ± 0.2 vs. +0.3 ± 0.2; P = 0.001) and dilatation of the cervix (+1.3 ± 0.3 vs. +0.9 ± 0.3; P = 0.005). No Bishop score criterion was found as a significant predictor for vaginal delivery. Conclusion CRB seems to be more effective than PG in increasing the consistency and dilatation of the cervix. Efficacy of CRB and PG for vaginal delivery was similar.

Vaginal delivery in women with a breech presentation is part of common practice in France despite much debate, and the induction of labor (IOL) with a fetus in a breech presentation at term remains uncommon. Little is known about the effectiveness of cervical ripening and its neonatal and maternal safety in these women. We present a retrospective study of 362 women who gave birth to a live singleton fetus in a breech presentation at term. The objective was to compare severe maternal and neonatal morbidity according to the planned mode of labor (spontaneous labor or the induction of labor (IOL) with a favorable cervix, cervical ripening, or elective cesarean delivery) and, specifically, to compare cervical ripening to the other modes of labor. The rate of severe neonatal morbidity was 3.0% and was significantly higher after the IOL compared to elective cesarean delivery (p = 0.02), and the severe maternal morbidity rates were similar. Multivariable logistic regression analysis found no significant association between cervical ripening and either composite severe neonatal (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10–43.6) or maternal morbidity (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 0.05–11.5). Our results support a policy of offering cervical ripening to the appropriately selected candidates with a singleton fetus in a breech presentation at term without increasing the incidence of severe maternal and neonatal morbidity.