This is a repository copy of A database solution for the quantitative characterisation and comparison of deep-marine siliciclastic depositional systems.

<p>Shelf-edge deltas constitute important components of source-to-sink (S2S) systems. They distribute sediment to continental slopes and basin floors from rivers that have prograded across shelves, and due to their scale they form significant sediment accumulations at shelf margins. Because of their intimate relationship with regressive conditions, several geological controls govern their evolution, including relative sea-level changes, sediment budgets, river hydrology, and hydrodynamic processes; these factors are themselves influenced by characteristics of terrestrial catchments and continental shelves, and by climate. Despite their important role in sediment dispersal to shallow- and deep-marine environments, shelf-edge deltas are commonly overlooked in models that describe S2S systems, perhaps because of their relative paucity during the present-day highstand conditions. In subsurface and outcrop, their recognition can be difficult in cases where information with which to constrain the physiographic environment is limited, such that the spatial position of a delta relative to the shelf margin cannot be determined unequivocally.</p><p>This study aims to improve our understanding of controls on the sedimentary characteristics of shelf-edge deltas. For this purpose, >40 shelf-edge deltas of Late Triassic to late Quaternary age from >30 globally-distributed shelf-margin successions have been investigated, utilising literature-derived seafloor-, subsurface- and outcrop data. Following a database approach, sedimentary records have been quantitatively analysed in terms of geometry (e.g. dimensions, thickness, gradients) and facies characteristics (e.g. lithology, sedimentary structures) of depositional environments (e.g. delta top, delta front) and architectural elements (e.g. delta lobes, distributary mouth bars). Specific consideration has been given to assessment of palaeoenvironmental setting (e.g. hydrodynamic process regime, margin type, bathymetric setting, palaeolatitude). Moreover, scaling relationships between these properties and attributes of the S2S system (e.g. fluvial-system and catchment attributes, shelf configuration, shelf-slope transition) have been evaluated. Accordingly, the relative importance of controls on the sedimentary characteristics of shelf-edge deltas has been assessed.</p><p>This analysis demonstrates that environmental factors influence the sedimentary record of shelf-edge deltas via a complex interplay of dynamic processes and physiography of the S2S segments catchment, shelf and slope. Based on these findings, new facies models for shelf-edge delta types are developed, which are placed in the context of S2S linkages. Outcomes of this study aid the identification and classification of shelf-edge deltas and their preserved deposits, as well as the reconstruction of associated environmental conditions from stratigraphic records.</p>

The role of possible controlling factors in influencing the geomorphology of submarine canyons has been investigated using a database of 282 globally distributed modern examples collated from the literature, open-source worldwide bathymetry and satellite imagery. Canyon geomorphology has been characterized quantitatively in terms of maximum and average canyon dimensions, canyon sinuosity, the average canyon thalweg gradient, and maximum canyon sidewall steepness. Geomorphological variations with respect to position of the canyon apex relative to the shelf break, continental-margin type, terrestrial source-to-sink system setting, oceanographic environment, and climate zones have been assessed. Scaling relationships between canyon morphometric parameters, and between them and attributes of their physiographic setting, their terrestrial catchments, and attributes of continental shelves and slopes have been quantified.Key findings are as follows: (i) a number of scaling relationships describing canyon morphometry (e.g. scaling between maximum canyon dimensions, relationships of maximum canyon sidewall steepness with maximum canyon width and depth) can be recognized globally, suggesting their general predictive value; (ii) possible causal links are identified between hydrodynamic processes (e.g. upwelling, longshore- and along-slope currents) and canyon morphology; (iii) potential predictors of canyon geomorphology include whether a canyon is incised into the shelf or confined to the slope, the continental-margin type, the oceanographic environment, latitude, and shelf-break depth; (iv) similarity in maximum width-to-maximum depth ratios across all settings suggests that the relative magnitudes of canyon-margin erosion and intra-canyon deposition do not vary greatly depending on setting or canyon size.The relationships between canyon geomorphology and environmental variables identified in this study may be incorporated into conceptual models describing canyon geomorphology and its relationship to other elements of deep-water systems, and into its broader source-to-sink context.

No abstract

A database-informed metastudy of 294 globally distributed submarine canyons has been conducted with the aim of elucidating the role of tectonic setting on submarine-canyon geomorphology. To achieve this, data from seafloor and subsurface studies derived from 136 peer-reviewed publications and from open-source worldwide bathymetry datasets have been statistically analyzed. In particular, relationships between margin type (active vs. passive) or plate-boundary type (convergent vs. transform vs. complex) have been assessed for key morphometric parameters of submarine canyons, including: streamwise length, maximum and average width and depth, canyon sinuosity, average canyon thalweg gradient, and maximum canyon sidewall steepness. In addition, possible scaling relationships between canyon morphometric parameters and characteristics of the associated terrestrial catchment, continental shelf and slope, and of the broader physiographic setting for canyons along both active and passive margins have been evaluated. The following principal findings arise: 1) overall canyon geomorphology is not markedly different across tectonic settings; 2) slope failure might be more important in passive-margin canyons compared to active ones, possibly due to seismic strengthening in the latter; 3) some aspects of canyon geomorphology scale with attributes of the source-to-sink system and environmental setting, but the strength and sign in scaling might differ between active and passive margins, suggesting that the extent to which canyon geomorphology can be predicted depends on the tectonic setting. Insights from our analysis augment and improve conceptual, experimental and numerical models of slope systems at the scale of individual canyons and source-to-sink systems, and increase our understanding of the complex role played by tectonic setting in shaping deep-water systems.