The DNA repair protein RAD52 is an emerging therapeutic target of high importance for BRCA-deficient tumors. Depletion of RAD52 is synthetically lethal with defects in tumor suppressors BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2. RAD52 also participates in the recovery of the stalled replication forks. Anticipating that ssDNA binding activity underlies the RAD52 cellular functions, we carried out a high throughput screening campaign to identify compounds that disrupt the RAD52-ssDNA interaction. Lead compounds were confirmed as RAD52 inhibitors in biochemical assays. Computational analysis predicted that these inhibitors bind within the ssDNA-binding groove of the RAD52 oligomeric ring. The nature of the inhibitor-RAD52 complex was validated through an in silico screening campaign, culminating in the discovery of an additional RAD52 inhibitor. Cellular studies with our inhibitors showed that the RAD52-ssDNA interaction enables its function at stalled replication forks, and that the inhibition of RAD52-ssDNA binding acts additively with BRCA2 or MUS81 depletion in cell killing.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14740.001
Discovery of novel tool compounds and drug leads against a range of unorthodox protein targets has pushed both experimental screening methodologies as well as the field of structure based design to the limit in recent years. Increasingly, it has been recognized that some of the most desirable targets for the development of small molecule effectors are actually protein-protein and protein-nucleic acid interactions. There are numerous nontrivial challenges to pursuing small molecule lead compounds directed toward PPIs and PNIs: relatively shallow cavities, large surface areas that are natively complexed to macromolecules, complex patterns of interstitial waters, a paucity of “hot spots”, large conformational changes upon ligand binding, etc. Although there have been some notable successes targeting PPIs in the last decade, there has been distinctly less success in the realm of targeting PNIs. This chapter focuses on an approach, successfully applied by our group to address the challenge of gaining traction on the PPI target RAD52, which is a protein that binds both single stranded and double stranded DNA, and is an anti-cancer target for certain types of cancer. There are many approaches to tackling the difficult problems of finding effective small molecules that disrupt PPIs and PNIs, but the methods presented here offer a series of elegant solutions, which integrate experimental HTS, biophysical methods, docking and molecular dynamics in a powerful way. Additionally, the structural knowledge gained from these studies provides a means for rationally understanding what features lead to ligand affinity in these fascinating and highly unorthodox pockets.
The DNA repair protein RAD52 is an emerging therapeutic target of high importance for BRCA-deficient tumors. Depletion of RAD52 is synthetically lethal with defects in tumor suppressors BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2. RAD52 also participates in the recovery of the stalled replication forks. Anticipating that ssDNA binding activity underlies the RAD52 cellular functions, we carried out a high throughput screening campaign to identify compounds that disrupt the RAD52-ssDNA interaction. Lead compounds were confirmed as RAD52 inhibitors in biochemical assays. Computational analysis predicted that these inhibitors bind within the ssDNA-binding groove of the RAD52 oligomeric ring. The nature of the inhibitor-RAD52 complex was validated through an in silico screening campaign, culminating in the discovery of an additional RAD52 inhibitor. Cellular studies with our inhibitors showed that the RAD52-ssDNA interaction enables its function at stalled replication forks, and that the inhibition of RAD52-ssDNA binding acts additively with BRCA2 or MUS81 depletion in cell killing.
Docking is a computer simulation method used to predict the preferred orientation of two interacting chemical species that has been successfully applied to numerous macromolecules over the years. However, non-traditional targets have inherent difficulties associated with their screening. Large interfaces, lack of obvious binding sites, and transient pockets are some examples. Additionally, most natural ligands of challenging targets are inadequate models for identifying or designing new ligands. Therefore, it is not surprising that customary techniques of structure-based virtual screening are incompatible with these non-traditional targets. We hypothesized that an integrative virtual screening campaign comprised of docking followed by refinement of best receptor-ligand complexes would effectively identify small-molecule ligands of challenging receptors. We targeted the single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding groove of the human RAD52, and a cryptic allosteric pocket of the Helicobacter pylori Glutamate Racemase (GR). In this project, we first determined which docking method was more appropriate for each studied non-traditional target, and then examined how good our two-step docking workflow was in finding novel active ligand scaffolds. This research developed a powerful layered virtual screening workflow for the discovery of lead compounds against challenging protein targets. Furthermore, we successfully applied a statistical analysis method, which used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, to validate the selected docking protocol that would be used in the screening campaigns. Using the validated workflow, we identified a natural compound that competes with ssDNA to bind to RAD52. The performed screening vi campaigns also provided new insights into the studied binding pockets, as well as structureactivity relationships (SAR) and binding determinants of the ligands. Our achievements reinforce the power of the ROC curve analysis approach in directing the search for the most appropriate docking protocol and helping to speed up drug discovery in pharmaceutical research.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.