IMPORTANCE There is limited information about the relative effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing alone compared with cytology in North American populations. OBJECTIVE To evaluate histologically confirmed cumulative incident cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) detected up to and including 48 months by primary HPV testing alone (intervention) or liquid-based cytology (control). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized clinical trial conducted in an organized Cervical Cancer Screening Program in Canada. Participants were recruited through 224 collaborating clinicians from January 2008 to May 2012, with follow-up through December 2016. Women aged 25 to 65 years with no history of CIN2+ in the past 5 years, no history of invasive cervical cancer, or no history of hysterectomy; who have not received a Papanicolaou test within the past 12 months; and who were not receiving immunosuppressive therapy were eligible. INTERVENTIONS A total of 19 009 women were randomized to the intervention (n = 9552) and control (n = 9457) groups. Women in the intervention group received HPV testing; those whose results were negative returned at 48 months. Women in the control group received liquid-based cytology (LBC) testing; those whose results were negative returned at 24 months for LBC. Women in the control group who were negative at 24 months returned at 48 months. At 48-month exit, both groups received HPV and LBC co-testing. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of CIN3+ 48 months following randomization. The cumulative incidence of CIN2+ was a secondary outcome. RESULTS Among 19 009 women who were randomized (mean age, 45 years [10th-90th percentile, 30-59]), 16 374 (8296 [86.9%] in the intervention group and 8078 [85.4%] in the control group) completed the study. At 48 months, significantly fewer CIN3+ and CIN2+ were detected in the intervention vs control group. All Participants Baseline Negative Screen Incidence Rate/1000 (95% CI) at 48 mo Risk Ratio (95% CI) Incidence Rate/1000 (95% CI) at 48 mo Risk Ratio (95% CI) Intervention Group Control Group CIN3+ 2.

30.9/1,000; 95%CI: 27.6, 34.6). At completion of Round 1 HPV-based cervical cancer screening in a population-based program resulted in greater CIN2+ detection of across all age cohorts compared to LBC screening.

(Abstracted from JAMA 2018;320:43–52) There are only limited data in North American populations on the relative diagnostic effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing alone compared with cytology.

No abstract

Background: Early implementation of programmatic colorectal cancer (CRC) screening for average-risk individuals 50–74 years of age in Canada has used fecal occult blood tests [FTS (guaiac or immunochemical)] and colonoscopy for follow-up of abnormal FTS. This paper presents results of an evaluation of this CRC screening. Methods: Five Canadian provincial programs provided aggregated data for individuals with a first-round FT processed between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2011. Results: The 104,750 people who successfully completed a first round of screening represented 16.1% of those who had access to the programs between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2011 (mean age: 61.2 years; men: 61.4 years; women: 61.1 years). Of those participants, 4661 had an abnormal FT (4.4%). Uptake of colonoscopy within 180 days after an abnormal FT was 80.5%, ranging from 67.8% to 89.5% by program. The positive predictive value (PPV) for adenoma was 35.9% for guaiac FT and 50.6% for immunochemical FT. Adenoma and CRC detection rates were, respectively, 16.9 and 1.8 per 1000 screened. Of invasive crcs detected, 64.6% were stage I or II. Conclusions: Considering the variation in characteristics and stage of implementation of each provincial program, the collaboration of the provinces leading to this report on the early performance of CRC screening in Canada is a major milestone. Targets are met or nearly met for significant indicators such as PPV for adenoma and cancer detection rate. Participation is expected to increase as programs are fully implemented in the provinces. Additional effort may be needed to improve timely access to follow-up colonoscopy.