Heart disease requires a surgical approach sometimes. Cardiac-surgery patients develop heart failure associated with ischemia induced during extracorporeal circulation. This complication could be decreased with anesthetic drugs. The cardioprotective effects of halogenated agents are based on pre- and postconditioning (sevoflurane, desflurane, or isoflurane) compared to intravenous hypnotics (propofol). We tried to put light on the shadows walking through the line of the halogenated anesthetic drugs’ effects in several enzymatic routes and oxidative stress, waiting for the final results of the ACDHUVV-16 clinical trial regarding the genetic modulation of this kind of drugs.

Background: Many clinical studies have identified some circulating micro-RNAs (miRNAs) as potential biomarkers with regard to the cardioprotective effects of halogenated agents administered perioperatively during myocardial conditioning procedures. However, there is a major methodological difficulty in identifying these potential miRNA targets in cardiac cells. Methods: We developed an in vitro protocol to analyze the differential expression of target miRNAs at the intracellular level in non-genetically modified primary human cardiomyocytes (HCMs) through their exposure to different hypnotic compounds (i.e., halogenated versus non-halogenated). For this purpose, we performed a validated in vitro model of “ischemia and reperfusion” with the transfection of specific miRNA mimics (MIMICs) designed to simulate naturally occurring mature miRNAs as a functional study. Afterwards, next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to identify and quantify miRNAs and elucidate their function. The differences in miRNA expression between HCMs exposed to different hypnotic drugs, along with the prediction of functional miRNA targets, were assessed using a meticulous in-house bioinformatics pipeline in order to derive diagnostic biomarkers and possible therapeutic targets. Conclusion: In brief, this methodological procedure was designed to investigate whether the cardioprotective effects of halogenated agents are a phenomenon mediated by either the activation or the suppression of miRNAs targeted by halogenated anesthetics.

Introduction: The cardioprotective effect of halogenated drugs in cardiac surgery has been the subject of several studies. However, there is scarcity of data on their potential nephroprotective effects. Aortic valve replacement and coronary revascularization are the most frequent cardiac surgery procedures. The objective of this explorative study was to examine the effect of desflurane vs. propofol on renal function, when administered in aortic valve replacement surgery, including the extracorporeal circulation period. Method: A quasi-experimental prospective study was performed in 60 patients, who were allocated to receive either desflurane or propofol intraoperatively during aortic valve replacement surgery. As a hypnotic, group 1 received propofol, whereas group 2 received desflurane. Markers of renal function and level of cardiac preservation were determined based on biochemical parameters (troponin I, NTProBNP). Results: In the propofol group, there were significant variations between postoperative values of urinary NGAL and creatinine and baseline values. In contrast, no variations were found in the desflurane group in terms of hemodynamic parameters and myocardial damage. Conclusions: The use of propofol vs. desflurane during aortic valve replacement surgery is associated with a decrease in renal function.

Introduction: The effect of halogenated drugs as cardioprotectors in cardiac surgery has been evaluated in several studies. However, the possibility that there is a protective role at renal level, triggered by their use, is currently under study. Aortic valve replacement and coronary revascularization are the most frequent surgeries in cardiac surgery. Our research evaluates the effect of desflurane compared to propofol in aortic valve replacement surgery at renal level; including its administration during extracorporeal circulation. Method: Quasi-experimental prospective study performed on 60 patients, divided into 2 groups according to the drug used in intraoperative aortic valve replacement surgery. In group 1 propofol was used as a hypnotic during surgery, in group 2 desflurane was used. Differences in kidney damage measured through the urinary NGAL marker were evaluated. Other markers of renal function and myocardial damage and the need for inotropic support during the first 48 hours were also measured. Results: There were significant variations in the values ​​of urinary NGAL and creatinine regarding to basal values ​​in the propofol group, but not in the desflurane group, in which there were no differences in the hemodynamic parameters and myocardial damage. Conclusion: the use of desflurane during aortic valve replacement surgery produced better renal preservation than propofol.