Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.Longitudinal study of 251 patients with surgical intercostobrachial nerve resection. Other chronic pains, psychological burden, inflammatory markers, and central sensitization characterize chronic postsurgical neuropathic pain.

Purpose We performed a detailed analysis of sensory function in patients with chronic post-surgical neuropathic pain (NP) after breast cancer treatments by quantitative sensory testing (QST) with DFNS (German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain) protocol and bed side examination (BE). The nature of sensory changes in peripheral NP may reflect distinct pathophysiological backgrounds that can guide the treatment choices. NP with sensory gain (i.e., hyperesthesia, hyperalgesia, allodynia) has been shown to respond to Na +-channel blockers (e.g., oxcarbazepine). Methods 104 patients with at least "probable" NP in the surgical area were included. All patients had been treated for breast cancer 4-9 years ago and the handling of the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) was verified by the surgeon. QST was conducted at the site of NP in the surgical or nearby area and the corresponding contralateral area. BE covered the upper body and sensory abnormalities were marked on body maps and digitalized for area calculation. The outcomes of BE and QST were compared to assess the value of QST in the sensory examination of this patient group. Results Loss of function in both small and large fibers was a prominent feature in QST in the area of post-surgical NP. QST profiles did not differ between spared and resected ICBN. In BE, hypoesthesia on multiple modalities was highly prevalent. The presence of sensory gain in BE was associated with more intense pain. Conclusions Extensive sensory loss is characteristic for chronic post-surgical NP several years after treatment for breast cancer. These patients are unlikely to respond to Na +-channel blockers.

Background Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) is a screening questionnaire to help identify neuropathic pain (NP) in clinical practice and research. We tested the accuracy of the DN4 questionnaire in stratifying possible NP (pNP) and definite NP (dNP) in patients operated for breast cancer. Methods We studied 163 patients from a longitudinal cohort of breast cancer operated patients 4–9 years after surgery. pNP or dNP were classified according to the NP grading system. Surgeon‐verified intercostobrachial nerve resection was used as a confirmatory test for dNP. A receiver‐operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to test the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values) of the DN4. Additionally, we studied clinical factors that associated with a positive screening outcome in the interview part of the DN4 (DN4i). Results DN4i and DN4 showed significant accuracy in stratifying patients with pNP or dNP with cut‐off scores 3 and 4 resulting to sensitivity of 66.2% and 79.4% and specificity of 77.8% and 92.6%, respectively. pNP and dNP patients showed differences in sensory descriptors of pain according to DN4i items. Screening positive on DN4i associated with dNP and younger age. Conclusions Full DN4 could stratify pNP and dNP patients in a chronic postsurgical NP patient group operated for breast cancer. Additionally, DN4i showed significant accuracy in stratifying pNP and dNP, but an examination is necessary to obtain proper accuracy. Demographic factors may have an impact on the screening outcome of DN4i. Significance DN4 stratifies possible and definite postsurgical peripheral neuropathic pain. DN4i may also show this, but full DN4 is more accurate. We confirm DN4i as a valid screening tool for NP.