The procedure recommended by different dosimetry protocols for the determination of the absorbed dose to air chamber factor, ND,pp, of plane-parallel chambers, comparing absorbed dose determinations in a high-energy electron beam with a reference cylindrical chamber having a known ND,cyl factor, has been investigated. Attention has been focused on the case that the chamber serving as reference has a solid aluminium central electrode. It has been found that using a wide spread Farmer-type chamber (NE 2571), together with recommendations which specifically take into account central electrode corrections for electron beam dosimetry, kcelpcel = pcel-global(IAEA) = 1.008, yields inconsistent results compared with those obtained from a fully homogeneous ionization chamber; for the NE 2571 chamber, a value kcelpcel = pcel-global(IAEA) congruent to 1.0 has been obtained. Analytical calculations of kmkatt for Farmer-type cylindrical chambers and experimental determinations of the product kmkattkcelpcel in electron beams agree within experimental uncertainties, with no evidence of statistical significance for the commonly used assumption pcel = 1, which yields a 0.8% correction (due to kcel only) for the effect of the NE 2571 aluminium electrode in electron beam dosimetry. The use of a 'NACP-chamber' specific factor (kpp or kmkatt) to obtain ND,pp from NK,pp in NACP plane-parallel chambers has been found unsatisfactory, and direct experimental determinations of ND,pp are recommended instead. It is suggested that Standard Dosimetry Laboratories provide ND,pp calibration factors in 60Co beams.

No abstract

In the present investigation, the necessary tests for implementing a quality assurance program for a commercial treatment planning system (TPS), recently installed at Sao Paulo University School of Medicine Clinicas Hospital-Brazil, was established and performed in accordance with the new IAEA publication TRS 430, and with AAPM Task Group 53. The tests recommended by those documents are classified mainly into acceptance, commissioning (dosimetric and nondosimetric), periodic quality assurance, and patient specific quality assurance tests. The recommendations of both IAEA and AAPM documents are being implemented at the hospital for photon beams produced by two linear accelerators. A Farmer ionization chamber was used in a 30 x 30 x 30 cm3 phantom with a dose rate of 320 monitor unit (MU)/min and 50 MU in the case of the dosimetric tests. The acceptance tests verified hardware, network systems integration, data transfer, and software parameters. The results obtained are in good agreement with the specifications of the manufacturer. For the commissioning dosimetric tests, the absolute dose was measured for simple geometries, such as square and rectangular fields, up to more complex geometries such as off-axis hard wedges and for behavior in the build up region. Results were analysed by the use of confidence limit as proposed by Venselaar et al. [Radio Ther. Oncol. 60, 191-201 (2001)]. Criteria of acceptability had been applied also for the comparison between the values of MU calculated manually and MU generated by TPS. The results of the dosimetric tests show that work can be reduced by choosing to perform only those that are more crucial, such as oblique incidence, shaped fields, hard wedges, and buildup region behavior. Staff experience with the implementation of the quality assurance program for a commercial TPS is extremely useful as part of a training program.