IMPORTANCE Biologics and targeted therapies, such as apremilast, are efficient treatments to manage moderate to severe psoriasis. More information about the risk of serious infection is needed for the newest treatment options in a real-world setting.OBJECTIVE To assess the risk of serious infection among biologics and apremilast used to treat psoriasis, with etanercept as the comparator. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThis nationwide cohort study from France involved data from the National Health Data System covering approximately 99% of the French population. All adults with psoriasis, defined as receiving at least 2 prescriptions of a topical vitamin D derivative within a 2-year period, registered in the database between January 1, 2008, and May 31, 2019, were eligible. The study population included those who were new users of biologic agents or apremilast (ie, without any prescriptions of a biologic or apremilast during the previous year). Patients with HIV infection or a history of cancer, transplant, or serious infection were excluded. End of follow-up was January 31, 2020.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary end point was a serious infection in a time-to-event analysis using propensity score-weighted Cox proportional hazards regression models, estimating weighted hazard ratios (wHRs) and 95% CIs.RESULTS A total of 44 239 new users of biologic treatment were identified (mean [SD] age, 48.4 [13.8] years; 22 866 [51.7%] men; median follow-up, 12 months [interquartile range, 7-24 months]). A total of 29 618 (66.9%) were prescribed a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor first, 6658 (15.0%) an interleukin (IL) 12/23 inhibitor, 4093 (9.3%) an IL-17 inhibitor, 526 (1.2%) an IL-23 inhibitor, and 3344 (7.6%) apremilast. The total number of serious infections was 1656, and the overall crude incidence rate was 25.0 (95% CI, 23.8-26.2) per 1000 person-years. The most frequent serious infections were gastrointestinal infections (645 patients [38.9%]). After adjusting for time-dependent covariables, risk of serious infections was higher for new users of adalimumab (wHR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.07-1.38) or infliximab (wHR, 1.79; 95% CI 1.49-2.16) vs etanercept, whereas ustekinumab was associated with a lower risk of having a serious infection (wHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67-0.94). Risk of serious infections was not increased for new users of IL-17 and the IL-23 inhibitor guselkumab or apremilast vs etanercept. Risk of serious infections was increased with concomitant nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or systemic corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEIn this cohort study of individuals with moderate to severe psoriasis, risk of serious infections was increased in new users of infliximab and adalimumab vs etanercept, whereas ustekinumab users had lower risk of having a serious infection but not new users of IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors or apremilast. Other observational studies are needed to confirm results for the most recent drugs.

ObjectivesTo assess the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and venous thromboembolism events (VTEs) among patients initiating a Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) (tofacitinib and baricitinib) versus adalimumab in a large real-world population of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.MethodsWe conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study of the French national health data system, the exposed group initiating a JAKi and non-exposed group initiating adalimumab. We included all individuals who had their first dispensation of a JAKi or adalimumab between 1 July 2017 and 31 May 2021 and had rheumatoid arthritis. The primary endpoints were the occurrence of a MACE or VTE. Weighted hazard ratio (HRw) values were estimated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting method to account for confounding factors with concomitant administration of methotrexate as a time-varying variable.ResultsThe cohort included 15 835 patients: 8481 and 7354 in the exposed and non-exposed groups (mean age 59.3 and 55.3 years, female 78.3% and 71.2%, respectively). During follow-up, 54 and 35 MACEs and 75 and 32 VTEs occurred in the exposed and non-exposed groups, respectively. Risk of MACEs for the exposed versus non-exposed group was not significant: HRw 1.0 (95% CI 0.7 to 1.5) (p=0.99), nor was risk of VTEs significant: HRw 1.1 (0.7 to 1.6) (p=0.63). Despite a lack of power, results were consistent among patients aged 65 years or older with at least one cardiovascular risk factor.ConclusionsThis study provides reassuring data regarding the risks of MACEs and VTEs in patients initiating a JAKi versus adalimumab, including patients at high risk of cardiovascular diseases.