BACKGROUND Despite the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes in youth, there are few data to guide treatment. We compared the efficacy of three treatment regimens to achieve durable glycemic control in children and adolescents with recent-onset type 2 diabetes. METHODS Eligible patients 10 to 17 years of age were treated with metformin (at a dose of 1000 mg twice daily) to attain a glycated hemoglobin level of less than 8% and were randomly assigned to continued treatment with metformin alone or to metformin combined with rosiglitazone (4 mg twice a day) or a lifestyle-intervention program focusing on weight loss through eating and activity behaviors. The primary outcome was loss of glycemic control, defined as a glycated hemoglobin level of at least 8% for 6 months or sustained metabolic decompensation requiring insulin. RESULTS Of the 699 randomly assigned participants (mean duration of diagnosed type 2 diabetes, 7.8 months), 319 (45.6%) reached the primary outcome over an average follow-up of 3.86 years. Rates of failure were 51.7% (120 of 232 participants), 38.6% (90 of 233), and 46.6% (109 of 234) for metformin alone, metformin plus rosiglitazone, and metformin plus lifestyle intervention, respectively. Metformin plus rosiglitazone was superior to metformin alone (P = 0.006); metformin plus lifestyle intervention was intermediate but not significantly different from metformin alone or metformin plus rosiglitazone. Prespecified analyses according to sex and race or ethnic group showed differences in sustained effectiveness, with metformin alone least effective in non-Hispanic black participants and metformin plus rosiglitazone most effective in girls. Serious adverse events were reported in 19.2% of participants. CONCLUSIONS Monotherapy with metformin was associated with durable glycemic control in approximately half of children and adolescents with type 2 diabetes. The addition of rosiglitazone, but not an intensive lifestyle intervention, was superior to metformin alone. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others; TODAY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00081328.)

The TODAY cohort is predominantly from racial/ethnic minority groups, with low socioeconomic status and a family history of diabetes. Clinical and biochemical abnormalities and comorbidities are prevalent within 2 yr of diagnosis. These findings contribute greatly to our understanding of American youth with type 2 diabetes.

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in type 1 diabetes (T1D) and relates strongly to insulin resistance (IR). Lean and obese T1D adolescents have marked IR. Metformin improves surrogate markers of IR in T1D, but its effect on directly-measured IR and vascular health in T1D youth is unclear. We hypothesized that 1) T1D adolescents have impaired vascular function, and 2) metformin improves this IR and vascular dysfunction. Methods: T1D adolescents and controls underwent MRI of the ascending (AA) and descending aorta (DA) to assess pulse wave velocity (PWV), relative area change (RAC), maximal (WSSMAX) and time-averaged wall shear stress (WSSTA). T1D participants also underwent assessment of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) by ultrasound, brachial distensibility (BrachD) by DynaPulse, fat and lean mass by DXA, fasting labs following overnight glycemic control, and insulin sensitivity by hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp (glucose infusion rate/insulin, [M/I]). T1D adolescents were randomized 1:1 to 3 months of 2000 mg metformin or placebo daily, after which baseline measures were repeated. Results: Forty-eight T1D adolescents ages 12–21 years (40% BMI ≥ 90th%ile; 56% female) and twenty-four nondiabetic controls of similar age, BMI and sex distribution were enrolled. T1D adolescents demonstrated impaired aortic health vs. controls, including elevated AA and DA PWV, reduced AA and DA RAC and elevated AA and DA WSSMAX and WSSTA. T1D adolescents in the metformin vs. placebo group had improved M/I (12.2±3.2 vs. −2.4±3.6 [mg/kg/min]/uIU/uL, p=0.005; 18.6±4.8 vs. −3.4±5.6 [mg/lean kg/min]/uIU/uL, p=0.005) and reduced weight (−0.5±0.5 vs. 1.6±0.5 kg, p=0.004), BMI (−0.2±0.15 vs. 0.4±0.15 kg/m2, p=0.005) and fat mass (−0.7±0.3 vs. 0.6±0.4 kg, p=0.01). M/I also improved in normal-weight participants (11.8±4.4 vs. −4.5±4.4 [mg/kg/min]/uIU/uL, p=0.02, 17.6±6.7 vs. −7.0±6.7 [mg/lean kg/min]/uIU/uL, p=0.02). The metformin group had reduced AA WSSMAX (−0.3±0.4 vs. 1.5±0.5 dyne/cm2, p=0.03), AA PWV, (−1.1±1.20 vs. 4.1±1.6 m/s, p=0.04) and far-wall diastolic cIMT (−0.04±0.01 vs. −0.00±0.01 mm, p=0.049) vs. placebo. Conclusions: T1D adolescents demonstrate IR and impaired vascular health vs. controls. Metformin improves IR, regardless of baseline BMI, and BMI, weight, fat mass, insulin dose, aortic and carotid health in T1D adolescents. Metformin may hold promise as a cardioprotective intervention in T1D.

OBJECTIVETo determine the frequency of islet cell autoimmunity in youth clinically diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and describe associated clinical and laboratory findings.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSChildren (10–17 years) diagnosed with type 2 diabetes were screened for participation in the Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth (TODAY) study. Measurements included GAD-65 and insulinoma-associated protein 2 autoantibodies using the new National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases/National Institutes of Health (NIDDK/NIH) standardized assays, a physical examination, and fasting lipid, C-peptide, and A1C determinations.RESULTSOf the 1,206 subjects screened and considered clinically to have type 2 diabetes, 118 (9.8%) were antibody positive; of these, 71 (5.9%) were positive for a single antibody, and 47 were positive (3.9%) for both antibodies. Diabetes autoantibody (DAA) positivity was significantly associated with race (P < 0.0001), with positive subjects more likely to be white (40.7 vs. 19%) (P < 0.0001) and male (51.7 vs. 35.7%) (P = 0.0007). BMI, BMI z score, C-peptide, A1C, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and blood pressure were significantly different by antibody status. The antibody-positive subjects were less likely to display characteristics clinically associated with type 2 diabetes and a metabolic syndrome phenotype, although the range for BMI z score, blood pressure, fasting C-peptide, and serum lipids overlapped between antibody-positive and antibody-negative subjects.CONCLUSIONSObese youth with a clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes may have evidence of islet autoimmunity contributing to insulin deficiency. As a group, patients with DAA have clinical characteristics significantly different from those without DAA. However, without islet autoantibody analysis, these characteristics cannot reliably distinguish between obese young individuals with type 2 diabetes and those with autoimmune diabetes.

OBJECTIVEAmong adolescents with type 2 diabetes, there is limited information regarding incidence and progression of hypertension and microalbuminuria. Hypertension and microalbuminuria assessments made during the TODAY clinical trial were analyzed for effect of treatment, glycemic control, sex, and race/ethnicity.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSA cohort of 699 adolescents, 10–17 years of age, <2 years duration of type 2 diabetes, BMI ≥85%, HbA1c ≤8% on metformin therapy, controlled blood pressure (BP), and calculated creatinine clearance >70 mL/min, were randomized to metformin, metformin plus rosiglitazone, or metformin plus intensive lifestyle intervention. Primary study outcome was loss of glycemic control for 6 months or sustained metabolic decompensation requiring insulin. Hypertension and microalbuminuria were managed aggressively with standardized therapy to maintain BP <130/80 or <95th percentile for age, sex, and height and microalbuminuria <30 μg/mg.RESULTSIn this cohort, 319 (45.6%) reached primary study outcome, and 11.6% were hypertensive at baseline and 33.8% by end of study (average follow-up 3.9 years). Male sex and higher BMI significantly increased the risk for hypertension. Microalbuminuria was found in 6.3% at baseline and rose to 16.6% by end of study. Diagnosis of microalbuminuria was not significantly different between treatment arms, sex, or race/ethnicity, but higher levels of HbA1c were significantly related to risk of developing microalbuminuria.CONCLUSIONSPrevalence of hypertension and microalbuminuria increased over time among adolescents with type 2 diabetes regardless of diabetes treatment. The greatest risk for hypertension was male sex and higher BMI. The risk for microalbuminuria was more closely related to glycemic control.