No abstract

The potential of first-void (FV) urine as a non-invasive liquid biopsy for detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA and other biomarkers has been increasingly recognized over the past decade. In this study, we investigated whether the volume of this initial urine stream has an impact on the analytical performance of biomarkers. In parallel, we evaluated different DNA extraction protocols and introduced an internal control in the urine preservative. Twenty-five women, diagnosed with high-risk HPV, provided three home-collected FV urine samples using three FV urine collection devices (Colli-Pee) with collector tubes that differ in volume (4, 10, 20 mL). Each collector tube was prefilled with Urine Conservation Medium spiked with phocine herpesvirus 1 (PhHV-1) DNA as internal control. Five different DNA extraction protocols were compared, followed by PCR for GAPDH and PhHV-1 (qPCR), HPV DNA, and HBB (HPV-Risk Assay), and ACTB (methylation-specific qPCR). Results showed limited effects of collection volume on human and HPV DNA endpoints. In contrast, significant variations in yield for human endpoints were observed for different DNA extraction methods (p < 0.05). Additionally, the potential of PhHV-1 as internal control to monitor FV urine collection, storage, and processing was demonstrated.

Vaccine‐induced human papillomavirus (HPV) antibodies originating from cervicovaginal secretions were recently shown to be detectable in first‐void (FV) urine. This presents a novel opportunity for noninvasive sampling to monitor HPV antibody status in women participating in large epidemiological studies and HPV vaccine trials. With a view towards method optimization, this study compared the measurement of HPV antibodies in FV urine using a multiplex L1/L2 virus‐like particles (VLP)‐based ELISA (M4ELISA) with previously reported results using a glutathione S‐transferase (GST)‐L1‐based immunoassay (GST‐L1‐MIA). We tested 53 paired FV urine and serum samples from 19‐ to 26‐year‐old healthy women, unvaccinated (n = 17) or vaccinated with either the bivalent or quadrivalent HPV‐vaccine during adolescence (n = 36). HPV6/11/16/18 antibodies were measured using M4ELISA and compared with GST‐L1‐MIA results. Inter‐assay and inter‐specimen correlations were examined using the Spearman's rank test (rs). As expected, lower HPV antibody concentrations were found in FV urine than in serum. Vaccinated women had significantly higher HPV6/11/16/18 antibody levels in both FV urine and serum compared with those unvaccinated (M4ELISA; FV urine P = .0003; serum P ≤ .0001). HPV antibody levels in FV urine and serum showed a significant positive correlation (M4ELISA anti‐HPV6/11/16/18, rs = 0.85/0.86/0.91/0.79, P ≤ .001). Despite assay differences, there was moderate to good correlation between M4ELISA and GST‐L1‐MIA (FV urine anti‐HPV6/11/16/18, rs = 0.86/0.83/0.89/0.53, P ≤  .0001; serum anti‐HPV6/11/16/18, rs = 0.93/0.89/0.94/0.75, P ≤ .0001). FV urine HPV antibody detection is comparable with both assays, further supporting this noninvasive sampling method as a possible option for HPV vaccine assessment. Approaches to improve the sensitivity and larger studies are warranted to determine the feasibility of FV urine for vaccine‐induced HPV antibody detection.

The potential of first-void (FV) urine as a non-invasive method to monitor human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has been reported, mainly focusing on urine as a sample to assess HPV DNA. Besides HPV DNA, vaccine-induced HPV antibodies originating from cervicovaginal secretions were recently shown to be detectable in FV urine as well. This presents a novel opportunity for non-invasive sampling to monitor HPV antibody status in women participating in large epidemiological studies and HPV vaccine trials. The simultaneous assessment of both HPV infection and immunogenicity on a non-invasive, readily obtained sample is particularly attractive.

No abstract