words Main text word count: 1864 words Condensation: 25words:There is a significant association between a positive fetal fibronectin and inflammatory placental pathology. Infective morbidity may be increased in women with a raised quantitative fFN who deliver preterm. Short title: Placental inflammation and fFN in women who deliver preterm Abstract ObjectiveLate miscarriage and preterm birth are frequently thought to be associated with inflammation and infection, although in most cases the underlying cause of early delivery remains unknown. The placenta is the organ that links mother and fetus during pregnancy, and postnatal examination may provide useful information about pathophysiology.The relationship between placental pathological lesions and predictive markers of early delivery has not been explored. We sought to characterize preterm deliveries according to placental pathology and relate these to the performance of reliable predictive markers, fetal fibronectin and cervical length. Study DesignThis is a retrospective subanalysis from a larger prospective cohort study on sonographic cervical length, quantitative fetal fibronectin and risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Our cohort was comprised of high-risk asymptomatic women attending the Prematurity Surveillance Clinic at St Thomas' Hospital between 2002 and 2015, who went on to have a late miscarriage or preterm delivery (16 to 36 +6 weeks') and who had available placental histology.The placental pathology of these preterm deliveries was characterized according to the lesions identified, and categorized (according to the Redman classification) into inflammatory (e.g. chorioamnionitis) or non-inflammatory (histologically normal or vascular lesions indicating e.g. malperfusion).We sought to relate placental findings to the performance of reliable predictive markers, in women who delivered early. Standard clinical cut offs for cervical length (< 25mm) and fetal fibronectin (>50 ng/mL) were used to identify the proportion of preterm births that were accurately predicted by the tests or who showed a false negative result, in relation to their placental histology findings. Binomial logistic regression was carried out to evaluate the relationship between placental inflammation, quantitative fFN and cervical length as continuous variables. Results105 women who had a late miscarriage or preterm delivery (16-36 +6 weeks') and available placenta pathology were identified. 66% (42/64) of those with inflammatory placental pathology had a positive fetal fibronectin swab result compared to 15% (6/41) of those with noninflammatory placental pathology (chi-squared 25.9, 95% CI 31.5 to 65.6, p<0.0001).A logistic regression model subanalysis of women in whom both CL and quantitative fFN results were available (n=66) revealed a highly statistically significant relationship with inflammatory placental lesions (p=0.003 and p=0.001 respectively). Placental inflammation was found to be associated with both increasing levels of fFN and a shortening cervix. ConclusionThere...
MethodsMedian concentrations of qfFN were compared in women who had a low lying placenta, covering the cervical os (n = 61) to matched controls (n= 61) without a low lying placenta. Proportions of women with raised qfFN concentrations (>10ng/ml), and false positive and negative rates (FPR and FNR) for spontaneous preterm delivery were also compared. ResultsThe median concentration of qfFN in women with low lying placenta was 5.0 ng/mL, compared with 6.0 ng/mL in controls. Proportion of women with raised levels (>10 ng/mL), positive levels (>50ng/mL) and very high levels (>200ng/mL) were similar in both groups (62.3% vs 59.0%, 16.3% vs 22.0% and 6.5% vs 4.9%, p>0.05 for all thresholds). The FPR and FNR rate for delivery before 34 and 37 weeks were also comparable (FPR 90.0% vs 85.7% and 80.0% vs 78.6%; FNR 5.8% vs 4.3% and 9.8% vs 8.5%) ConclusionsCVF qfFN concentrations in asymptomatic high-risk women are not affected by the presence of a low-lying placenta.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.