The only currently validated treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is sorafenib. However, sorafenib has been mainly studied in patients with HCC developed in cirrhotic liver. Chemotherapy might be more suitable for patients with HCC in non-cirrhotic liver. We report the case of a young woman with fibrolamellar HCC in a non-cirrhotic liver, with histologically proven metastatic ganglionary relapse after surgical resection of the primary tumour. Chemotherapy with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX regimen) achieved a complete response without relapse five years after discontinuation of chemotherapy. This exceptional case raises the question of clinical trials specifically designed for patients with HCC in non-cirrhotic liver.

Background Using a specific bioethical theory (=global bioethics) and method (=a posteriori), we try here to identify and evaluate the bio‐ethical issues raised by the COVID‐19 pandemic, and possible solutions, to improve the management of cancer patients at the hospital in future pandemics, before the emergence of vaccines or scientifically validated treatments. Materials & Methods Our work is based primarily on the clinical experience of three oncologists from the oncology department of Foch Hospital in France, who were on the frontline during the first wave of the epidemic. We compared their perceptions with published findings, to complete or nuance their views. Results Three bio‐ethical issues were identified, and possible solutions to these problems were evaluated: (1) scientific evidence versus lack of time → the creation of emergency multidisciplinary team meetings (MTM); (2) healthcare equality versus lack of resources → the development of telemedicine; (3) individual liberties versus risk of contamination → role of cancer patients' associations, psychologists and bioethicists. Conclusion We consider the creation of an emergency MTM, in particular, in addition to a true ethics committee with real competence in bioethics, to be a first solution that would be easy to implement in hospitals in many countries.

In this prospective pilot study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of the FOLFIRI regimen (irinotecan 180 mg/m², leucovorin 200 mg/m² d1 followed by bolus 400 mg/m² 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and by a 46-h 2400 mg/m² 5-FU infusion, every 2 weeks) in patients with advanced esophageal or junctional adenocarcinoma. Twenty-nine patients were included. A complete response was obtained in 2 patients, a partial response in 7 patients (objective response rate 31.0%). Stable disease was obtained in 13 patients (disease control rate 75.9%). The median progression-free and overall survivals were 5.9 and 8.6 months, respectively. One patient died from chemotherapy-related diarrhea after one cycle but this patient presented concomitant disease progression with cerebral metastases. We observed one additional grade 4 diarrhea, one grade 3 vomiting, and two grade 3 neutropenias. To conclude, FOLFIRI regimen appears quite active, with an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced esophageal or junctional adenocarcinoma.

No abstract