Increased interest in career counseling has led to the need for measuring the impact of career counseling in a more precise and meaningful way. This article discusses some of the issues raised by a survey of career counseling outcome research. The implications of these issues are presented in the form of a set of recommendations for researchers.
In spite of the proliferation of job/career Web sites and the many articles and books discussing how to use these sites in job searching, we know of no research dealing with career assessment on the Internet. In an effort to remedy this deficit, the authors located a multitude of career sites containing a bewildering array of offerings. The research reported here focused on 24 Web career sites identified as having no-cost career assessment. While easy to use, the sites provided only a moderate degree of test interpretation and fit into a schema of career planning only to a limited extent. The authors' subjective overall evaluation of these sites was not high (3.3 on a 5-point scale)—just above the mid-point of "Neither good nor poor." Ratings of the factors based on the National Career Development Association (NCDA) guidelines for career planning on the Internet tended to be low: few sites provided much information about the developers of the site, no site asserted that its assessment instrument was validated for self-use, and no site stated that the sites to which it provided links met NCDA guidelines. Most sites provided confidentiality only to a limited extent in that they generally did not ask for the visitor's name and password. The authors discuss implications of their research for career counseling professionals, for career research, and for career site developers.
The growing concern for women and women's rights has been reflected in an increasing amount of research on women. As counselors may be unaware of the results of this research and its implications for counseling, the author surveys some of the recent investigations in four areas: counselor bias, demographic changes, sex differences, and sex‐role stereotypes. After providing a review of the research in each area, she discusses implications of the findings. The author also makes specific suggestions for counselors who wish to confront some of the issues raised by recent research on women.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.