SUMMARYVoluntary loss of an appendage, or autotomy, is a remarkable behavior that is widespread among many arthropods and lower vertebrates. Its immediate benefit, generally escape from a predator, is balanced by various costs, including impaired locomotor performance, reproductive success and long-term survival. Among vertebrates, autotomy is most widespread in lizards, in which tail loss has been documented in close to 100 species. Despite numerous studies of the potential costs of tail autotomy in lizards, none have focused on the importance of the tail in jumping. Using high-speed video we recorded jumps from six lizards (Anolis carolinensis) both before and after removing 80% of the tail to test the hypothesis that tail loss has a significant effect on jumping kinematics. Several key performance metrics, including jump distance and takeoff velocity, were not affected by experimental tail removal, averaging 21 cm and 124 cm s Supplementary material available online at

A central problem in evolutionary biology is to understand how spatial and temporal variation in selection maintain genetic variation within and among populations. Brown anole lizards (Anolis sagrei) exhibit a dorsal pattern polymorphism that is expressed only in females, which occur in "diamond," "bar," and intermediate "diamond-bar" morphs. To understand the inheritance of this polymorphism, we conducted a captive breeding study that refuted several single-locus models and supported a two-locus mode of inheritance. To describe geographic variation in morph frequencies, we surveyed 13 populations from two major islands in The Bahamas. Morph frequencies differed substantially between major islands but were highly congruent within each island.Finally, we measured viability selection on each island to test two hypotheses regarding the maintenance of the polymorphism:(1) that spatial variation in selection maintains variation in morph frequencies between islands, and (2) that temporal variation in selection across years maintains variation within islands. Although bar females had relatively lower survival where they were rare, our data do not otherwise suggest that selection varies spatially between islands. However, diamond-bar females were subject to positive frequency-dependent selection across years, and the relative fitness of bar and diamond females alternated across years.We propose that this polymorphism is maintained by temporal variation in selection coupled with the sheltering of alleles via a two-locus inheritance pattern and sex-limited expression.K E Y W O R D S : Drift, genetic variation, island, lizard, polymorphism, selection.

Background Perturbations in the function of core circadian clock components such as the Period (Per) family of genes are associated with alcohol use disorder, and disruptions in circadian cycles may contribute to alcohol abuse and relapse. This study tested ethanol consumption, reinforcement, and metabolism in mice containing functional mutations in Per1 and/or Per2 genes on an ethanol-preferring background, C57BL/6J mice. Methods Mice were tested in: (A) free-access intake with ascending concentrations of ethanol (2–16% v/v); (B) conditioned place preference using ethanol (2 g/kg for males; 2.5 g/kg for females) vs. saline injections; (C) recovery of the righting reflex following a 4 g/kg bolus of ethanol; and (D) blood ethanol levels 1 hour after a 2 g/kg bolus of ethanol. Results All Per mutant (mPer) mice showed increased ethanol intake and condition place preference compared to controls. There were also genotypic differences in blood ethanol concentration: in males, only mPer1 mice showed a significantly higher blood ethanol concentration than WT mice, but in females, all mPer mice showed higher blood ethanol levels than WT mice. Conclusions Mutation of either Per1 or Per2, as well as mutations of both genes, increases ethanol intake and reinforcement in an ethanol-preferring mouse model. In addition, this increase in ethanol seeking behavior seems to result both from a change in ethanol metabolism and a change in reward responding to ethanol, but not from any change in sensitivity to ethanol’s sedating effects.