Restriction of the sulfur amino acids methionine and cysteine has recently been proposed as potential adjuvant therapy in cancer. While cysteine depletion has been associated with ferroptotic cell death, methionine depletion has not. We hypothesized that comparing the response of melanoma cell lines to depletion of the amino acids methionine and cysteine would give us insight into the critical role in cancer of these two closely related amino acids. We analyzed the response to three conditions: methionine depletion, methionine replacement with homocysteine, and cysteine depletion. In cancer cells, the transcription factor ATF4 was induced by all three tested conditions. The replacement of methionine with homocysteine produced a strong ferroptotic gene signature. We also detected an activation of the NRF2 antioxidant pathway by both methionine and cysteine depletion. Total glutathione levels were decreased by 42% in melanoma cells grown without methionine, and by 95% in cells grown without cysteine. Lipid peroxidation was increased in cells grown without cysteine, but not in cells grown without methionine. Despite the large degree of overlap in gene expression between methionine and cysteine depletion, methionine depletion and replacement of methionine with homocysteine was associated with apoptosis while cysteine depletion was associated with ferroptosis. Glutamine depletion produced comparable gene expression patterns and was associated with a 28% decrease in glutathione. Apoptosis was detected in these cells. In this experiment, a strong ATF4‐driven ferroptotic gene signature was insufficient to induce ferroptosis without a concomitant profound decrease in glutathione levels.
The last 5 years has seen a renaissance in clinical trials for DC vaccination, with a number of increasingly sophisticated approaches being reported in the literature. This Commentary will take an idiosyncratic snapshot of some of the more creative clinical trials. "
Dietary methionine restriction, defined as reduction of methionine intake by around 80%, reproducibly decreases tumor growth and synergizes with cancer therapies. Here, we combined dietary methionine restriction with immune checkpoint inhibitors in a model of colon adenocarcinoma. In vitro, we observed that methionine restriction increased the expression of MHC-I and PD-L1 in both mouse and human colorectal cancer cells. We also saw an increase in the gene expression of STING, a known inducer of type I interferon signaling. Inhibition of the cGAS-STING pathway, pharmacologically or with siRNA, blunted the increase in MHC-I and PD-L1 surface and gene expression following methionine restriction. PD-L1 expression was also This indicated that the cGAS-STING pathway in particular, and interferon in general, is playing a role in the immune response to methionine restriction. We then combined dietary methionine restriction with immune checkpoint inhibitors targeted against CTLA-4 and PD-1 in a MC38 colorectal cancer tumor model in C57BL/6 mice. The combination treatment was five times more effective at reducing tumor size than immune checkpoint inhibition alone in males. We noted sex differences in the response to dietary methionine restriction for the MC38 tumor model in C57BL/6 mice. Finally, we observed an increase in PD-L1 protein expression in MC38 tumors from animals who were fed a methionine-restricted diet. Furthermore, the distribution of CD8 staining changed from mostly peripheric in the controls, to intratumoral in the methionine-restricted tumors. MHC-I, which has a high basal expression in MC38 cells, was highly expressed in all tumors. These results indicate that methionine restriction improves the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in mice, and that this improvement is associated with the cGAS-STING pathway and interferon signaling.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.