Patient centeredness is an increasingly recognized aspect of quality health care. The application of this framework to contraceptive counseling and care has not been well described. We propose a definition of patient-centered contraceptive counseling that focuses on and prioritizes each patient's individual needs and preferences regarding contraceptive methods and the counseling experience. Guided by this definition, we review recent research that has advanced our understanding of how patient-centered contraceptive counseling can be delivered in practice, focusing on how women decide on a contraceptive method, their preferences for counseling, and their experiences with counseling. This research provides evidence that women have diverse preferences around attributes of their contraceptive methods and value personal, supportive relationships with their family planning providers that focus on their individual preferences. We discuss the implications of this research for practice and review recent interventions that incorporate patient centeredness to varying degrees.

No abstract

Background. Hyperparathyroidism is underdiagnosed in pregnancy, yet early diagnosis is necessary for the potentially severe sequelae of hypercalcemia for both the woman and fetus. Case. A 31-year-old, gravida 3, para 0-0-2-0 at 32 weeks and 3 days of gestation, presented with preeclampsia with severe features concomitant with acute pancreatitis and known diabetes mellitus type 2. She was stabilized and delivered. In the postpartum period, her total calcium level remained elevated. Ionized calcium levels and parathyroid hormone levels were also elevated, and she was diagnosed with hyperparathyroidism. Conclusion. Hyperparathyroidism and hypercalcemia are risk factors for pancreatitis. Women who develop pancreatitis during pregnancy are at increased risk of developing preeclampsia. If elevated serum calcium is noted, it should be confirmed with ionized calcium level and parathyroid hormones as ionized calcium levels are unaffected by pregnancy.

has been reviewed by the Editorial Board and by special expert referees. Although it is judged not acceptable for publication in Obstetrics & Gynecology in its present form, we would be willing to give further consideration to a revised version.If you wish to consider revising your manuscript, you will first need to study carefully the enclosed reports submitted by the referees and editors. Each point raised requires a response, by either revising your manuscript or making a clear and convincing argument as to why no revision is needed. To facilitate our review, we prefer that the cover letter include the comments made by the reviewers and the editor followed by your response. The revised manuscript should indicate the position of all changes made. We suggest that you use the "track changes" feature in your word processing software to do so (rather than strikethrough or underline formatting).

(Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132:1461–1468) Although recommendations do exist, there is a lack of evidence-based guidelines for the care of women with a history of sexual trauma. Current literature, which consists predominantly of qualitative studies, supports the use of trauma-informed care, defined as the recognition of the prevalence of trauma, acknowledgment of the role trauma may have played, and integration of that knowledge into treatment. In order to identify effective trauma-informed care practices, the authors of the present study interviewed women with a history of sexual trauma and discussed their preferences regarding pregnancy and the childbirth experience.