Accurate assessment of dietary intake and physical activity is a vital component for quality research in public health, nutrition, and exercise science. However, accurate and consistent methodology for the assessment of these components remains a major challenge. Classic methods use self-report to capture dietary intake and physical activity in healthy adult populations. However, these tools, such as questionnaires or food and activity records and recalls, have been shown to underestimate energy intake and expenditure as compared with direct measures like doubly labeled water. This paper summarizes recent technological advancements, such as remote sensing devices, digital photography, and multisensor devices, which have the potential to improve the assessment of dietary intake and physical activity in free-living adults. This review will provide researchers with emerging evidence in support of these technologies, as well as a quick reference for selecting the "right-sized" assessment method based on study design, target population, outcome variables of interest, and economic and time considerations. Theme information: This article is part of a theme issue entitled Innovative Tools for Assessing Diet and Physical Activity for Health Promotion, which is sponsored by the North American branch of the International Life Sciences Institute.
Objective
To estimate the reliability and validity of the Nutrition Literacy Assessment Instrument for Parents (NLit-P) and to investigate relationships between parental nutrition literacy, parental and child BMI, and child diet quality (Healthy Eating Index, HEI).
Methods
Cross-sectional study of 101 parent-child dyads which collected measures of socioeconomic status, nutrition literacy, 2–24 hour child diet recalls, and BMI. Reliability of NLit-P was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis. Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression was used.
Results
Fair to substantial reliability was seen across 5 NLit-P domains, while Pearson correlations support concurrent validity for the NLit-P related to child diet quality and parental income, age, and educational attainment (p<0.001). For every 1% increase in NLit-P, there was a 0.51 increase in child HEI (R2=0.174; p<0.001).
Conclusions and Implications
The NLit-P demonstrates potential for measuring parental nutrition literacy, which may be an important educational target for improving child diet quality.
BackgroundDifferences in biological changes from weight loss by energy restriction and/or exercise may be associated with differences in long-term weight loss/regain.ObjectiveTo assess the effect of weight loss method on long-term changes in weight, body composition and chronic disease risk factors.Data SourcesPubMed and Embase were searched (January 1990-October 2013) for studies with data on the effect of energy restriction, exercise (aerobic and resistance) on long-term weight loss. Twenty articles were included in this review.Study Eligibility CriteriaPrimary source, peer reviewed randomized trials published in English with an active weight loss period of >6 months, or active weight loss with a follow-up period of any duration, conducted in overweight or obese adults were included.Study Appraisal and Synthesis MethodsConsiderable heterogeneity across trials existed for important study parameters, therefore a meta-analysis was considered inappropriate. Results were synthesized and grouped by comparisons (e.g. diet vs. aerobic exercise, diet vs. diet + aerobic exercise etc.) and study design (long-term or weight loss/follow-up).ResultsForty percent of trials reported significantly greater long-term weight loss with diet compared with aerobic exercise, while results for differences in weight regain were inconclusive. Diet+aerobic exercise resulted in significantly greater weight loss than diet alone in 50% of trials. However, weight regain (∼55% of loss) was similar in diet and diet+aerobic exercise groups. Fat-free mass tended to be preserved when interventions included exercise.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.