In this paper, we are interested in exploring the question: how much explicit, named attention has reflection received in engineering education scholarship and how do we interpret these results? We conducted a systematic literature review of the ASEE (American Society of Engineering Education) conference publications to better understand the role of reflection in engineering education scholarship through assessing the number of papers that involve reflection in some way.In our search, we categorized the publications by scope of reflection: the extent to which reflection is mentioned, and type of reflection: how reflection is being operationalized. As a result of our findings, it is evident that there has been a significant and recognizable upward trend in the explicit attention to reflection across the body of the ASEE conference publications. Understanding the trends of reflection across literature can help us further analyze its prevalence and importance in the engineering education community.

No abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe how the Graduate Engineering Education Consortium for Students (GEECS) peer mentoring works and its contribution to the growth of a community of emerging engineering education scholars. Specifically, we discuss the progress of two peer mentoring groups through autoenthographies, which are based on the authors' experiences in developing, facilitating, and contributing to the peer mentoring groups. GEECS peer mentoring is a space for groups of engineering education graduate students to support one another through such activities as goal setting and monitoring.

To explore the general question of ways to help educators become more reflective, this paper focuses on the proposition that one way to help educators be more reflective is to give them an opportunity to discuss (or be interviewed about) an activity they do with students. To address this proposition, we use a "multiple perspectives methodology" featuring essays from seven educators about their experiences of being interviewed about a reflection activity they have done with students. The educators' essays suggest that the interviews were experienced as (1) a reflection opportunity, (2) a chance to reflect on the activity that was the focus of the interview, (3) a chance to reflect on reflection as an educational activity, and (4) a chance to bridge reflection and other points of personal interest. The results presented in this paper provide a basis for suggesting that interviewing educators about activities they use with students is a promising way to support educator reflection.

No abstract