These results show a strong association between chronic allograft rejection and the development of antitissue antibodies and suggest that these antibodies could be used to identify patients at high risk of developing chronic rejection after liver transplantation.
Although immunosuppressive therapy after organ transplantation is paramount for long-term outcomes, patients do not comply with their immunosuppressive treatment as much as might be expected. In this observational study, patients having undergone a kidney or liver transplantation were enrolled. Adherence was evaluated by patients using the compliance evaluation test and by physicians using a visual analogic scale. A linear regression was performed to identify determinants of adherence. Less patients having undergone kidney transplantation (27%) described themselves as good compliers than liver transplanted patients (40%). Discrepancy was noted between the physician and patient assessments. Rates of good adherence were significantly different depending on gender, age at transplantation, retransplantation, and time elapsed since transplantation, in at least one of the groups evaluated (whole cohort, kidney liver transplantation groups). In all three groups, adherence decreased with the number of immunosuppressants prescribed. In the whole cohort, the rate of good adherence was significantly higher in patients taking lower number of immunosuppressive drugs (45% for 1 vs. 24% for 3 immunosuppressants; p = 0.02). In this study, which is the first study of this scale in France, we confirmed that adherence with immunosuppressant treatment was low and that simpler treatment regimens may favor adherence.
Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is an autoimmune liver disease characterized by the presence of antimitochondrial antibodies (AMA) directed primarily against the E2 subunits of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, the branched chain 2-oxo-acid dehydrogenase complex, the 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex, as well as the dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase-binding protein (E3BP) of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex. The autoantibody response to each E2 subunit is directed to the lipoic acid binding domain. However, hitherto, the epitope recognized by autoantibodies to E3BP has not been mapped. In this study, we have taken advantage of the recently available full-length human E3BP complementary DNA (cDNA) to map this epitope. In addition, another lipoic binding protein, the H-protein of the glycine cleavage complex, was also studied as a potential autoantigen recognized by AMA. Firstly, the sequence corresponding to the lipoic domain of E3BP (E3BP-LD) was amplified by polymerase chain reaction and recombinant protein and then purified. Immunoreactivity of 45 PBC sera (and 52 control sera) against the purified recombinant E3BP-LD was analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunoblotting. Secondly, reactivity of PBC sera was similarly analyzed by immunoblotting against H-protein. It is interesting that preabsorption of patient sera with the lipoic acid binding domain of E3BP completely removed all reactivity with the entire protein by immunoblotting analysis, suggesting that autoantibodies to E3BP are directed solely to its lipoic acid binding domain. Fifty-three percent of PBC sera reacted with E3BP-LD, with the majority of the response being of the immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype (95%). Surprisingly, there was little IgM response to the E3BP-LD suggesting that the immune response was secondary because of determinant spreading. In contrast, H-protein does not appear to possess (or expose) autoepitopes recognized by PBC sera. This observation is consistent with structural data on this moiety.
The risk of PBC recurrence is real (8.7%). The presence of plasma cells in the portal infiltrate seems to be an early marker of recurrence of PBC in patients transplanted for this indication.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.