Voltage-dependent inactivation of CaV2.3 channels was investigated using point mutations in the beta-subunit-binding site (AID) of the I-II linker. The quintuple mutant alpha1E N381K + R384L + A385D + D388T + K389Q (NRADK-KLDTQ) inactivated like the wild-type alpha1E. In contrast, mutations of alpha1E at position R378 (position 5 of AID) into negatively charged residues Glu (E) or Asp (D) significantly slowed inactivation kinetics and shifted the voltage dependence of inactivation to more positive voltages. When co-injected with beta3, R378E inactivated with tau(inact) = 538 +/- 54 ms (n = 14) as compared with 74 +/- 4 ms (n = 21) for alpha1E (p < 0.001) with a mid-potential of inactivation E(0.5) = -44 +/- 2 mV (n = 10) for R378E as compared with E(0.5) = -64 +/- 3 mV (n = 9) for alpha1E. A series of mutations at position R378 suggest that positively charged residues could promote voltage-dependent inactivation. R378K behaved like the wild-type alpha1E whereas R378Q displayed intermediate inactivation kinetics. The reverse mutation E462R in the L-type alpha1C (CaV1.2) produced channels with inactivation properties comparable to alpha1E R378E. Hence, position 5 of the AID motif in the I-II linker could play a significant role in the inactivation of Ca(V)1.2 and CaV2.3 channels.
The E462R mutation in the fifth position of the AID (alpha1 subunit interaction domain) region in the I-II linker is known to significantly accelerate voltage-dependent inactivation (VDI) kinetics of the L-type CaV1.2 channel, suggesting that the AID region could participate in a hinged-lid type inactivation mechanism in these channels. The recently solved crystal structures of the AID-CaVbeta regions in L-type CaV1.1 and CaV1.2 channels have shown that in addition to E462, positions occupied by Q458, Q459, E461, K465, L468, D469, and T472 in the rabbit CaV1.2 channel could also potentially contribute to a hinged-lid type mechanism. A mutational analysis of these residues shows that Q458A, Q459A, K465N, L468R, D469A, and T472D did not significantly alter VDI gating. In contrast, mutations of the negatively charged E461, E462, and D463 to neutral or positively charged residues increased VDI gating, suggesting that the cluster of negatively charged residues in the N-terminal end of the AID helix could account for the slower VDI kinetics of CaV1.2. A mutational analysis at position 462 (R, K, A, G, D, N, Q) further confirmed that E462R yielded faster VDI kinetics at +10 mV than any other residue with E462R >> E462K approximately E462A > E462N > wild-type approximately E462Q approximately E462G > E462D (from the fastest to the slowest). E462R was also found to increase the VDI gating of the slow CEEE chimera that includes the I-II linker from CaV1.2 into a CaV2.3 background. The fast VDI kinetics of the CaV1.2 E462R and the CEEE + E462R mutants were abolished by the CaVbeta2a subunit and reinstated when using the nonpalmitoylated form of CaVbeta2a C3S + C4S (CaVbeta2a CS), confirming that CaVbeta2a and E462R modulate VDI through a common pathway, albeit in opposite directions. Altogether, these results highlight the unique role of E461, E462, and D463 in the I-II linker in the VDI gating of high-voltage activated CaV1.2 channels.
The ancillary beta subunits modulate the activation and inactivation properties of high-voltage activated (HVA) Ca(2+) channels in an isoform-specific manner. The beta subunits bind to a high-affinity interaction site, alpha-interaction domain (AID), located in the I-II linker of HVA alpha1 subunits. Nine residues in the AID motif are absolutely conserved in all HVA channels (QQxExxLxGYxxWIxxxE), but their contribution to beta-subunit binding and modulation remains to be established in Ca(V)2.3. Mutations of W386 to either A, G, Q, R, E, F, or Y in Ca(V)2.3 disrupted [(35)S]beta3-subunit overlay binding to glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins containing the mutated I-II linker, whereas mutations (single or multiple) of nonconserved residues did not affect the protein-protein interaction with beta3. The tryptophan residue at position 386 appears to be an essential determinant as substitutions with hydrophobic (A and G), hydrophilic (Q, R, and E), or aromatic (F and Y) residues yielded the same results. beta-Subunit modulation of W386 (A, G, Q, R, E, F, and Y) and Y383 (A and S) mutants was investigated after heterologous expression in Xenopus oocytes. All mutant channels expressed large inward Ba(2+) currents with typical current-voltage properties. Nonetheless, the typical hallmarks of beta-subunit modulation, namely the increase in peak currents, the hyperpolarization of peak voltages, and the modulation of the kinetics and voltage dependence of inactivation, were eliminated in all W386 mutants, although they were preserved in part in Y383 (A and S) mutants. Altogether these results suggest that W386 is critical for beta-subunit binding and modulation of HVA Ca(2+) channels.
The alpha-interacting domain (AID) in the I-II linker of high voltage-activated (HVA) Ca 2؉ channel ␣1 subunits binds with high affinity to Ca V  auxiliary subunits. The recently solved crystal structures of the AIDCa V  complex in Ca V 1.1/1.2 have revealed that this interaction occurs through a set of six mostly invariant residues Glu/Asp 6 (9). Ca V  subunit modulation of LVA T-type (Ca V 3.1-3.3) channels has yet to be reported (10).Ca V  subunits increase peak current density, in part by recruiting the Ca V ␣1 subunit to the plasma membrane (11)(12)(13)(14), by hyperpolarizing the voltage dependence of activation and inactivation, and by increasing the channel opening probability at the single channel level (4, 15). Ca V  subunits increase inactivation kinetics in an isoform-specific manner with Ca V 3 Ͼ Ca V 1b Ͼ Ca V 1a Ͼ Ca V 4 Ͼ Ͼ Ca V 2a (4). The four known auxiliary Ca V  subunits can potentially associate with any of the six Ca V ␣1 pore-forming subunits of HVA VDCC (Ca V 1.1-1.4, Ca V 2.1-2.3) via the alpha interaction domain (AID) located on the I-II linker of the Ca V ␣1 subunit. The AID motif is absent from LVA T-type (Ca V 3.1-3.3) VDCC for which Ca V  subunit modulation has never been reported. About half of the residues of the AID helix (Gln 1 -Gln 2 -X 3 -Glu 4 -X 5 -X 6 -Leu 7 -X 8 -Gly 9 -Tyr 10 -X 11 -X 12 -Trp 13 -Ile 14 -X 15 -X 16 -X 17 -Glu 18 ) are strictly conserved (in bold) among the six Ca V ␣1 subunits but homology was found to be higher within members of the Ca V 1 and Ca V 2 families. Nonetheless, positions 8, 11, and 15 are occupied by residues that could vary even within the same Ca V family (Table I) (where X can be any residue) might not be the unique determinant of the Ca V ␣1- interaction. In vitro binding experiments have revealed the presence of additional interaction sites of lower affinity on the cytoplasmic loops of Ca V 2.1 (16,17) and on the C-terminal of Ca V 2.3 (18) but the AID appears to be the primary high affinity site of interaction (14, 15).
The molecular basis for inactivation in Ca(V)2.3 (alpha 1E) channels was studied after expression of alpha 1E/alpha 1C (Ca(V)2.3/Ca(V)1.2) chimeras in Xenopus oocytes. In the presence of 10 mM Ba(2+), the CEEE chimera (Repeat I+part of the I-II linker from Ca(V)1.2) displayed inactivation properties similar to Ca(V)1.2 despite being more than 90% homologous to Ca(V)2.3. The transmembrane segments of Repeat I did not appear to be crucial as inactivation of EC(IS1-6)EEE was not significantly different than Ca(V)2.3. In contrast, EC(AID)EEE, with the beta-subunit binding domain from Ca(V)1.2, tended to behave like Ca(V)1.2 in terms of inactivation kinetics and voltage dependence. A detailed kinetic analysis revealed nonetheless that CEEE and EC(AID)EEE retained the fast inactivation time constant (tau(fast) approximately equal to 20-30 ms) that is a distinctive feature of Ca(V)2.3. Altogether, these data suggest that the region surrounding the AID binding site plays a pivotal albeit not exclusive role in determining the inactivation properties of Ca(V)2.3.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.