AimsTo determine whether severity patterns or nocturnal ventilation to treat sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) during chronic heart failure (CHF) is associated with adverse outcomes. Although SDB is frequent during CHF, the relationships between SDB and CHF outcomes are unknown.
Methods and resultsA total of 384 CHF patients (82% men, mean age 59 + 13 years) with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤45% (mean LVEF 29 + 9%) were assessed by polygraphy in our clinic between 2001 and 2009. Nocturnal ventilation was started according to the severity of SDB. Combined endpoints were death, heart transplant, and implant of a ventricular assist device. The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), central sleep apnoea (CSA), and Cheyne -Stokes respiration (CSR) was 62, 26, and 29%, respectively. A primary endpoint occurred in 31%. Mean follow-up for survivors was 47 + 25 months. Those with moderate [apnoea -hypopnoea index (AHI) ≤5-20/h] and severe SDB (AHI ≥20/h), and OSA and CSA, had poor prognoses compared with patients without SDB (P ¼ 0.036, P ¼ 0.003, respectively). A total of 31% of SDB patients were treated with nocturnal ventilation. Treated SDB had a better outcome than untreated severe SDB after adjustment for confounding factors [P ¼ 0.031; hazard ratio (HR) 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33-0.95]. Subgroup analysis that included only OSA showed a similar result after adjustment (P ¼ 0.017; HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.19 -0.95).
ConclusionsIn CHF, SDB is associated with a poor prognosis whatever the SDB pattern, and nocturnal ventilation is associated with a better outcome.--
The prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing was high in a French heart failure population, with most syndromes having an obstructive pattern. Prevalence and severity were higher in men than in women.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.