Purpose The impact of the type of anesthesia (regional vs. general anesthesia) on in-hospital complications in ankle fractures has not been thoroughly studied yet. Identifying factors that place patients at risk for complications following ankle fractures may help reduce their occurrence. The primary goal of this study was (1) to describe the cohort of patients and (2) to evaluate independent risk factors for complications during hospitalization. Methods We analyzed patients from 2005 to 2019 with an operatively treated isolated fracture of the medial or lateral malleolus using a prospective national quality measurement database. Patients were selected based on international classifications (ICD) and national procedural codes (CHOP). Uni- and multivariate analysis were applied. Results In total, we analyzed 5262 patients who suffered a fracture of the malleolus; 3003 patients (57%) had regional and 2259 (43%) general anesthesia. Patients with regional anesthesia were significantly older (51 vs. 46 years), but healthier (23 vs. 28% comorbidities) than patients who received general anesthesia. The in-hospital complication rate was not significantly lower in regional anesthesia (2.2% vs 3.0%). The type of anesthesia was not an independent predictor for complications while controlling for confounders. Conclusion Type of anesthesia was not an independent predictor of complications; however, higher ASA class, age over 70 years, fracture of the medial versus lateral malleolus, longer preoperative stay, and duration of surgery were significant predictors of complications. Patient and procedure characteristics, as well as changes in medical care and epidemiological changes along with patient requests, influenced the choice of the type of anesthesia.

SummaryWe present the case of a patient with the rare disorder tracheobronchopathia osteochondroplastica who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. After induction of general anaesthesia, we faced difficulties passing the tracheal tube beyond the vocal cords despite bronchoscopic assistance. With a smaller tube, and by using rotating movements, we managed to successfully intubate the trachea. Because of the irregular tracheal surface, however, ventilation was challenging due to a massive cuff leak. Repeated repositioning did not improve this leak. Only cuff overinflation led to adequate ventilation, though we were cognisant of the increased risk of tracheal wall injury with this approach. After completion of the surgery, the patient's trachea was extubated without complication. This case showed that even with good preparation, intra‐operative problems can occur with abnormal subglottic airway anatomy. In some circumstances, these problems can only be solved by compromise. There are no professional consensus or guidelines that can be followed as guiding references for such a case, which can lead to indecisiveness.