Background Preterm birth is associated with higher risk of death and severe neurodevelopmental impairment. There is an increased risk in extremely preterm infants, raising questions among ethicists and clinicians as to whether providing active care to infants born at the lower extreme is worth the outcomes, and if these outcomes are a source of decisional regrets for parents. Objectives Explore decisional regrets in parents of extremely preterm children. Design/Methods We consecutively recruited all parents of infants born <29 weeks’ gestational age, aged between 18 months corrected age and 7 years, and seen for neonatal follow-up at a single tertiary center over a one-year period. We asked the following question: “Knowing what you know now, is there anything you would have done differently?” Answers were analyzed independently by two reviewers using qualitative methodology, and discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer. Mixed methods were used to examine the frequency of each theme and associate parental answers to demographic and clinical factors. Results Responses were obtained from 249 parents (98% participation rate). The following main themes emerged: (1) Nothing – I did what I could or was told to do: 53%; (2) Regrets about self-care: 31%; “I would listen to the nurses’ advice to sleep more” (3) Guilt related to the impression preterm labor could have been prevented by them or the medical team: 19%; “I would have pushed for better care and monitoring during pregnancy. I felt as though I wasn’t listened to when I thought I was in labour when sure enough I was” (4) Regrets about parental role in decision-making: 15%; “I would speak up more at the beginning of the hospitalisation”. None of the parents reported on regretting any life-and-death decisions they made at birth and in the neonatal unit. Conclusion In our cohort, more than half of parents of surviving preterm infants did not have any regrets associated to their NICU experience. However, lessons can be learned to improve parental support, self-care and solutions to improve their role as parents. Unlike what can be stated using “opinion-based medicine”, limiting or forgoing intensive care is not a solution to eliminate decisional regrets in parents.
Background Extremely preterm birth is associated with death and a higher risk of adverse long-term outcomes. Neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) has become the focus of neonatal follow-up and outcome research, with classifications chosen by clinicians and researchers. However, parents were never consulted about this classification. Objectives To examine parental perspectives about the health of their ex-preterm infants. Design/Methods Over a one-year period, at Sainte-Justine University Hospital’s Neonatal Follow-Up Clinic, all parents of children born <29 weeks’ gestational age, aged between 18 months corrected age and 7 years were approached. They were asked two questions: “Please rate your child’s health from your point of view on a scale from 0 (very poor) to 10 (excellent)” and “If you could improve up to two things about your child’s health and/or development, what would they be?” Responses were analyzed using mixed methods. Results 249 parental responses were obtained (98% participation rate). On average, parents rated their child’s health to be 8/10 (range 3-10/10, median 8/10). Main themes invoked about areas for improvement were developmental outcomes (65%):“if he could talk and hold his head up himself”; respiratory heath and overall medical fragility (35%): “improve the health of her lungs”; and behavior/emotional issues (21%): “his anxiety”. Twenty-three percent did not wish to improve anything: “I am very happy with his health and development. I hope he continues on the same path.” When examining developmental outcomes more closely, the recurrent sub-themes for improvement were: language/communication (22%), motor/movement (17%) and cognitive/learning (16%): “improving her attention in school”. Conclusion When they come to neonatal follow-up, parents generally perceive the health of their extremely preterm children in a positive way. While some parents have no wishes for improvement in their children, many are concerned by their children’s NDI. On the other hand, several parent-important outcomes, such as lung health and overall medical fragility, are insufficiently investigated during follow-up at the present time.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.