Abstract3D geomechanical characterization of "Fuja" field reservoirs, Niger Delta, was carried out to evaluate the mechanical properties of the reservoir rock which will assist in reducing drilling and exploitation challenges faced by operators. Bulk density, sonic, and gamma-ray logs from four wells were integrated with 3D seismic data and core data from the area to estimate the elastic and inelastic rock properties, pore pressure, total vertical stress, as well as maximum and minimum horizontal stresses within the reservoirs from empirical equations, using Petrel and Microsoft Excel software. 3D geomechanical models of these rock properties and cross-plots showing the relationship between the elastic and inelastic properties were also generated. From the results, Young's modulus, bulk modulus, bulk compressibility, shear modulus, Poisson's ratio, and unconfined compressive strength recorded average values of 5.11 GPa, 5.10 GPa, 0.023 GPa−1$$,$$ , 2.39 GPa, 0.39, and 39.0 GPa, respectively, in the sand, and 6.08 GPa, 6.09 Gpa, 0.016 GPa−1 2.84 GPa, 0.42, and 42.3 GPa, respectively, in shale, implying that the sand is less elastic and ductile and will deform before the shale under similar stress conditions. Results also revealed mean pore pressures of 13,248 psi and 15,220 psi in sand and shale units, respectively, mean total vertical stress of 28,193 psi, mean maximum horizontal stress of 26,237 psi, and mean minimum horizontal stress of 21,532 psi. From the geomechanical models, the rock elastic and inelastic parameters revealed higher values around the northeastern and parts of the eastern and western portions of the reservoir implying that mechanical rock deformation will be minimal in these sections of the field compared to other sections during drilling and post-drilling activities. The generated cross-plots indicate that a relationship exists between the elastic rock properties and unconfined compressive strength. Stress estimations within the reservoirs in relation to the obtained elastic and rock strength parameters show that the reservoirs are stable. These results will be invaluable in mitigating exploration and exploitation challenges.

3-D seismic interpretation and petrophysical analysis of the Osaja Field, Niger Delta, was carried out with aim of carrying out a detailed structural interpretation, reservoir characterization and volumetric estimation of the field. Four wells were correlated across the field to delineate the lithology and establish the continuity of reservoir sand as well as the general stratigraphy of the area. The petrophysical analysis carried out, revealed two sand units that are hydrocarbon bearing reservoirs (Sand_A and Sand_B).The spatial variation of the reservoirs were studied on a field wide scale using seismic interpretation. Time and depth structural maps generated were used to establish the structural architecture/geometry of the prospect area of the field. The depth structure map revealed NE-SW trending anticlinal structures with F5 and F6 as faults assisted closures to the reservoir. Furthermore, reservoir parameters such as net pay, water saturation porosity, net-to-gross etc, were derived from the integration of seismic and well log data. The structural interpretation on the 3-D seismic data of the study area revealed a total of seven faults ranging from synthetic to antithetic faults. The petrophysical analysis gave the porosity values of the reservoir Sand_A ranging from 18.1 - 20.3% and reservoir Sand_B ranging from 13.1-14.9% across the reservoir. The permeability values of reservoir Sand_A ranging from 63-540md and reservoir Sand_B ranging from 18-80md hence there is decrease in porosity and permeability of the field with depth.The net-to-gross varies from 22.1% to 22.4% in Rerservoir Sand A to between 5.34- 12% for Rerservoir Sand _A while Sw values for the reservoirs ranges from 38-42% in well 2 to about 68.79-96.06% in well 11. The result of original oil in place for all the wells calculated revealed that well 2 has the highest value with 9.3mmbls. These results indicate that the reservoirs under consideration have a poor to fair hydrocarbon (oil) prospect.

3-D seismic interpretation and petrophysical analysis of the Osaja Field, Niger Delta, was carried out with aim of carrying out a detailed structural interpretation, reservoir characterization and volumetric estimation of the field. Four wells were correlated across the field to delineate the lithology and establish the continuity of reservoir sand as well as the general stratigraphy of the area. The petrophysical analysis carried out, revealed two sand units that are hydrocarbon bearing reservoirs (Sand_A and Sand_B).The spatial variation of the reservoirs were studied on a field wide scale using seismic interpretation. Time and depth structural maps generated were used to establish the structural architecture/geometry of the prospect area of the field. The depth structure map revealed NE-SW trending anticlinal structures with F5and F6as faults assisted closures to the reservoir. Furthermore, reservoir parameters such as net pay, water saturation porosity, net-to-gross etc, were derived from the integration of seismic and well log data. The structural interpretation on the 3-D seismic data of the study area revealed a total of seven faults ranging from synthetic to antithetic faults. The petrophysical analysis gave the porosity values of the reservoir Sand_A ranging from 18.1 - 20.3% and reservoir Sand_B ranging from 13.1-14.9% across the reservoir. The permeability values of reservoir Sand_A ranging from 63-540md and reservoir Sand_B ranging from 18-80md hence there is decrease in porosity and permeability of the field with depth.The net-to-gross varies from 22.1% to 22.4% in Rerservoir Sand A to between 5.34- 12% for Rerservoir Sand _A while Sw values for the reservoirs ranges from 38-42% in well 2 to about 68.79-96.06% in well 11. The result of original oil in place for all the wells calculated revealed that well 2 has the highest value with 9.3mmbls. These results indicate that the reservoirs under consideration have a poor to fair hydrocarbon (oil) prospect.