The establishment of accurate data on the number of people with dementia is essential in the planning of services and initiatives.

Background: Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are a source of distress and burden for caregivers. This study attempts to determine the neuropsychiatric symptoms, demographic characteristics, and referral patterns of outpatients with dementia compared with patients admitted to the acute psychogeriatric wards of Woodbridge Hospital. We also assessed the impact of neuropsychiatric symptoms on distress in family and professional caregivers.Method: Eighty-five consecutive patients with a first-time diagnosis of dementia were recruited. They were assessed using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Caregiver Distress Scale (NPI-D). The professional caregiver distress questions were rephrased to assess the “occupational disruptiveness” of behaviors in the nursing home version (NPI-NH).Results: Neuropsychiatric symptoms were common and were positively correlated with caregiver distress. Family caregivers were significantly more distressed than professional caregivers over the delusion, agitation, depression and aberrant motor domains, although the severity of the behavioral disturbances reported was not higher in the sample. The median NPI scores for the agitation and disinhibition domains were significantly higher in the inpatient group, contrasting with a higher score for the depression domain among the outpatient group.Conclusions: This study highlights the prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia and illustrates the strong correlation between the severity of behavioral disturbances and caregiver distress.

Elderly males were more likely to report suicidal ideations when depressed. Elderly patients who reported suicidal ideations were likely to be more severely depressed. However, in a depressed elderly person, the absence of suicidal ideations would not infer that the episode of depression was less severe.

BackgroundMultiple studies have reported high burnout rates among residents, including psychiatry. There is a paucity of studies examining the relationship between burnout and learning context, stress levels, resilience, stigma in healthcare providers and coping methods concurrently within the same cohort.ObjectiveWe examined the rate of burnout among our psychiatry residents in a cross-sectional study and hypothesised that burnout is associated with poorer perception of learning environment, greater perceived stress, stigma levels, lower resilience and specific coping strategies during training.MethodsNinety-three out of 104 psychiatry residents (89.4%) within our National Psychiatry Residency Programme participated in the study from June 2016 to June 2018. Relevant scales were administered to assess the perception of learning environment, burnout, stress, resilience, stigma levels and coping methods, respectively. We performed comparisons of the above measures between groups (burnout vs no burnout) and within-group correlations for these same measures.ResultsOverall, 54.8% of the sample met criteria for burnout. Residents with burnout had poorer perception of the learning environment, greater stress levels (both p<0.001), were less willing to disclose/seek help and employed greater active-avoidance coping strategies. Within the burnout group, greater perceived stress was correlated with poorer perception of learning environment (rs=−0.549) and greater use of active-avoidance coping (rs=0.450) versus additional use of problem-focussed coping within the non-burnout group.ConclusionsBurnout was related to both environment and learner factors. These findings viewed within the transactional, sequential and imbalance models of burnout suggest the need to address stressors, beef up coping, provide continual support and develop resilience among our learners.

Several items in the European QIs in the current format were deemed problematic when used to measure the quality of psychosocial care in the residential aged care settings in participating Asia-Pacific countries. We propose refinements of the European QIs for the Asian-Pacific context, taking into account multiple factors identified in this study. Our findings provide crucial insights for future research and implementation of psychosocial dementia care QIs in this region.