Objective The haematopoietic cytopenia (HC) of the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors was evaluated using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Method Data from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2021 has been retrieved from the FAERS database. Disproportionality analysis and Bayesian analysis were utilized in the data mining. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for HC was calculated for each CDK 4/6 inhibitor agent. Clinical features of the patients were collected and compared between death outcome and non-death outcome groups. Time to onset (TTO), proportion of deaths, life-threatening and hospitalizations of CDK 4/6 inhibitors-associated HC were also studied. Results A total of 17,235 cases of HC associated with CDK 4/6 inhibitors were identified with a median age of 65 years (interquartile range [IQR] 57–73). Palbociclib appeared the strongest signal, with the highest (ROR 9.64, 95% CI 9.46–9.83), followed by ribociclib (ROR 6.38, 95% CI 6.04–6.73) and then abemaciclib (ROR 2.72, 95% CI 2.49–2.97). Patients aged 18–64 had a higher proportion of deaths than those aged 65–84 (12.21% vs. 9.91%, p = 0.001). In Africa and Asia, the proportions of deaths were higher (31.65% and 26.13%, respectively). The median TTO was 26 days (IQR 14–65) for abemaciclib, 33 days (IQR 15–134) for palbociclib and 23 days (IQR 14–69) for ribociclib, respectively. The highest proportion of deaths, life-threatening and hospitalizations all occurred in abemaciclib (13.00%, 5.42% and 44.04%, respectively). Conclusions Greater proportions of deaths occurred in Africa and Asia. HC may occur early in any CDK 4/6 inhibitor regimen. Abemaciclib had the highest proportion of deaths, life-threatening and hospitalizations. Health care workers should be more concerned about CDK 4/6 inhibitors. The higher proportions of serious events, including deaths, from Africa and Asia, as well as for abemaciclib, deserve further investigations through additional pharmacoepidemiological approaches.
Phase 2 study of cemiplimab in patients with metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: primary analysis of fixed-dosing, long-term outcome of weight-based dosing.
In addition to providing extra flap size, the tissue expansion process also brings changes in flap thickness. This study aims to identify the changes in the forehead flap thickness during the tissue expansion period. Patients undergoing forehead expander embedment from September 2021 to September 2022 were included. The thickness of the forehead skin and subcutaneous tissue were measured with ultrasound before and 1, 2, 3, and 4 months after expansion. Twelve patients were included. The average expansion period was 4.6 months, and the mean expansion volume was 657.1 mL. The thickness of skin and subcutaneous tissue in the central forehead changed from 1.09 ± 0.06 to 0.63 ± 0.05 mm and from 2.53 ± 0.25 to 0.71 ± 0.09 mm, respectively. In the left frontotemporal region, skin and subcutaneous tissue thickness changed from 1.03 ± 0.05 to 0.52 ± 0.05 mm and 2.02 ± 0.21 to 0.62 ± 0.08 mm. On the right side, skin and subcutaneous tissue thickness changed from 1.01 ± 0.05 to 0.50 ± 0.04 mm and 2.06 ± 0.21 to 0.50 ± 0.05 mm. This study measured the dynamic changes in the thickness of the forehead flap during expansion. The thickness of the forehead flap decreased the fastest in the first 2 months of expansion, and the changes in skin and subcutaneous thickness slowed down in the third and fourth months and tended to a minimum value. Additionally, the thickness of subcutaneous tissue decreased greater in magnitude than the dermal tissue.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.