People are increasingly able to access their laboratory (lab) results using patient-facing portals. However, lab reports for citizens are often identical to those for clinicians; without specialized training they can be near impossible to interpret. In this study, we inspected a mobile health application (app) that converts traditional lab results into a citizen-centred format. We used the Health Literacy Online (HLO) checklist to inspect the app. Our inspection revealed that most of the app’s strengths were related to its Organization of Content and Simple Navigation and most of its weaknesses were related to Engage Users. We also identified several usability and user experience (UX) issues that were beyond the purview of the HLO checklist. Although this app represents an important step towards making lab results universally accessible, we identified several opportunities for improvements that could increase its value to citizens.

Laboratory (lab) test results are increasingly available online for patient review. However, there is a dearth of research with respect to users’ information needs, goals, and information processing strategies. In this exploratory qualitative study, we interviewed a sample of (N = 25) online lab results users to understand their objectives and search targets. We transcribed their responses and used affinity diagramming to identify themes in their responses. Our analysis identified six reasons why people look at their online lab results (i.e., health status, reassurance, health education, speed, self-management, and patient safety) and two themes about what people look for (i.e., abnormal and normal values, trends). Knowing what drives users and what information they are looking for can inform the design of online lab reporting, improve usefulness, and better satisfy user needs.

People are increasingly accessing their own laboratory (lab) results online. However, Canadians may be expected to use different systems to access their results, depending upon where they are tested (e.g., community lab vs. hospital), and these results may be displayed differently. This study examined the extent to which participants without medical expertise (N = 25) made errors identifying lab results (i.e., missing or mis-identifying abnormal results) in a mock report. Six participants overlooked each of the flagged values, 20 participants missed an abnormal result that was not flagged, and 2 participants mis-identified a normal value as out of range. We describe potential causes of these errors and the implications for the design of consumer-facing lab results.

The 21st century has brought forth unprecedented technological advances, such as the advent of portable digital devices [1]. This trend has also permeated the health care sector, with the introduction of digital health services, like providing citizens with access to their online laboratory (lab) results. This qualitative study will illustrate the patient journey, namely participant 16 (P16), to address the research question: what phases does a person go through when accessing their lab results online? The findings revealed that lab results were accessed from two types of devices a tablet (e.g., portable computer) when at home and a mobile phone when away from home. We also found that interpretation of results can be a challenge and it was unclear if P16 was able to understand her lab results. To illustrate the complexity of interpreting and accessing online lab results, the authors created a Customer Journey Map to contextualize the experiences of P16. The journey map depicts a combination of factors such as: eHealth literacy, limited access to providers, difficulty interpreting lab test results. Additionally, recommendations for online lab portal functionality enhancements were discovered through the mapping exercise. This study demonstrated that along with providing citizens with access to digital health technologies and services, considerations to eHealth literacy, the digital divide and health equity are paramount. As evidenced by the visualization, journey maps hold promise to serve as efficient tools to build empathy and identify the unique needs and perspectives of citizens.

BACKGROUND Consumer (e.g., patient, layperson) access to online laboratory results has increased dramatically over the past decade. However, many systems are not designed with the patient in mind. OBJECTIVE The purpose of the research is to determine the interface facilitators and barriers affecting patient use of an online laboratory (lab) system. This will inform future systems designs to optimize care and safety. METHODS We distributed to patients an online questionnaire with closed-ended (i.e., Likert scale) and open-ended questions. We analyzed closed-ended questions using descriptive statistics; we analyzed open-ended questions using affinity diagramming. RESULTS Patients preferred reviewing lab results online, rather than waiting to see the physician. However, patients gave poor ratings for the communication of online lab results (i.e., usability, information, and displays). Displays received the weakest rating, indicating an area needing urgent attention. CONCLUSIONS Improving the usability, information, and the displays of these online laboratory systems could better satisfy consumer requirements and improve patient empowerment, care, and safety.