Treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) alone is associated with an estimated 40% efficacy in early recanalization of major coronary artery (MCA) occlusions. AIS still has almost a 60% rate of mortality or disability in patients treated with IV tPA, despite aggressive therapy. Endovascular treatment is currently being researched. The IA administration of tPA is safe and effective, but remains an unapproved, off-label treatment for AIS. Hypothesized advantages of intra-arterial tPA include direct visualization of acute large vessel thrombi; the ability to customize the tPA dose and location of drug delivery based on features of the individual clot, and potentially more complete thrombolysis. This paper exams the evidence on Intraarterial tPA administration versus IV tPA in patients outside of the 4.5 hr treatment window established by the FDA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.