Background
: The recent recommendation for hands-only (continuous chest compression) CPR has caused concern that professional rescuers may over-ventilate to compensate for a lack of ventilation before their arrival. Previous research shows that over-ventilation can be deleterious.
Methods
: We conducted a prospective, randomized, parallel design study of the effectiveness of a customized metronome to guide both compressions and ventilations during CPR with an unsecured airway or a secured airway. Firefighter EMTs performed 2-rescuer CPR on an instrumented manikin, 34 EMTs with and 34 EMTs without metronome guidance. Each session consisted of 2 min of 30:2 CPR with an unsecured airway, then 4 min of CPR with a secured airway (100/min continuous compressions and 8 –10 ventilations/min), repeated after the rescuers switched roles. The metronome gave “tock” prompts for compressions and a spoken “ventilate” prompt. Endpoints included compression and ventilation rates.
Results
: Metronome use significantly decreased the incidence of over-ventilation (11/34 CPR sessions vs 0/34; p<0.001). As previously documented, compression rate errors were significantly less with the metronome. For unsecured airways, mean compression rate error was 21/min for control vs. 0 for the metronome group, (p<0.001); for secured airways, mean compression rate error was 18/min for control vs. 1/min for the metronome group (p<0.001).
Conclusions
: A compression/ventilation metronome helps avoid over-ventilation and improves compression rate when used by professional rescuers on a manikin. The metronome may be highly effective in avoiding over-ventilation during CPR with a secured airway.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.