Despite the evidence for the role of inflammation in cancer initiation, promotion, and progression, the precise mechanism by which the inflammation within tumor is orchestrated by inflammatory cells remains to be determined. Here IntroductionChronic inflammation, a "promoting force" in the tumor microenvironment, has long been known to be commonly braided with the initiation, promotion, and progression of tumorigenesis. [1][2][3][4][5] To date, however, it is still incompletely understood how the inflammation in the tumor microenvironment is orchestrated by inflammatory cells. Recently, mast cells were highlighted as not only a major participator but also an important regulator of inflammation, 6,7 and their accumulation in tumors has also been well documented, [8][9][10][11][12][13] implying that mast cells may possibly play an important role in orchestrating the inflammation in tumors.The tumor microenvironment is regarded as a "smoldering" inflammation site in which a lot of cytokines, chemokines, and enzymes mediate the inflammatory process and drive malignant progression. 14,15 Among them, TNF-␣, IL-6, VEGF, iNOS, Cox-2, and MMP-9 are of particular interest. [15][16][17][18] Coincidentally, all of them can be produced by mast cells. However, the tumor microenvironment is also characterized by its immunoediting from immunosurveillance to immunosuppression. 19 Mast cells have been found to play a critical role in the suppression of immune reactions. 20 They not only produce inhibitory cytokine IL-10, 21 but they also are essential for the immune tolerance mediated by regulatory T (Treg) cells. 22 Thus, mast cell infiltration into tumor may possibly remodel tumor microenvironment and profoundly influence tumor behavior by participating and regulating inflammatory and immune reactions. However, although some studies have shown that mast cells promote tumor angiogenesis and tumor growth because of their properties as inflammatory cells, [23][24][25] the roles of mast cells in tumor progression have been incompletely understood so far. Several key questions remain unclear, especially how mast cells are recruited into the tumor site and whether they can remodel the tumor microenvironment.Mast cell migration to the tumor site and the following activation may be the prerequisite for their promoting effect on tumors. In this regard, stem cell factor (SCF) is possibly involved, because SCF triggers the c-Kit signaling pathway for the differentiation, migration, maturation, and survival of mast cells. 26 In the present study, we investigated the relation of mast cells and SCF in tumor progression and showed that SCF recruited and activated mast cells, the activated mast cells remodeled the tumor microenvironment by intensifying inflammation and immunosuppression, the tumor cell NF-B and AP-1 activities were augmented, and the suppression of T cells and natural killer (NK) cells was exacerbated in such remodeled microenvironments. These findings provide a new insight into the role of mast cells in tumors and the relati...

No abstract

Glioblastoma patients are immunosuppressed, yet glioblastomas are highly infiltrated by monocytes/macrophages. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC; immunosuppressive myeloid cells including monocytes) have been identified in other cancers and correlate with tumor burden. We hypothesized that glioblastoma exposure causes normal monocytes to assume an MDSC-like phenotype and that MDSC are increased in glioblastoma patients. Healthy donor human CD14(+) monocytes were cultured with human glioblastoma cell lines. Controls were cultured alone or with normal human astrocytes. After 48 hours, glioblastoma-conditioned monocytes (GCM) were purified using magnetic beads. GCM cytokine and costimulatory molecular expression, phagocytic ability, and ability to induce apoptosis in activated lymphocytes were assessed. The frequency of MDSC was assessed by flow cytometry in glioma patients' blood and in GCM in vitro. As predicted, GCM have immunosuppressive, MDSC-like features, including reduced CD14 (but not CD11b) expression, increased immunosuppressive interleukin-10, transforming growth factor-beta, and B7-H1 expression, decreased phagocytic ability, and increased ability to induce apoptosis in activated lymphocytes. Direct contact between monocytes and glioblastoma cells is necessary for complete induction of these effects. In keeping with our hypothesis, glioblastoma patients have increased circulating MDSC compared with normal donors and MDSC are increased in glioma-conditioned monocytes in vitro. To our knowledge, this has not been reported previously. Although further study is needed to directly characterize their origin and function in glioblastoma patients, these results suggest that MDSC may be an important contributor to systemic immunosuppression and can be modeled in vitro by GCM.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a prototype of lethal, chronic, progressive interstitial lung disease of unknown etiology. Over the past decade, macrophage has been recognized to play a significant role in IPF pathogenesis. Depending on the local microenvironments, macrophages can be polarized to either classically activated (M1) or alternatively activated (M2) phenotypes. In general, M1 macrophages are responsible for wound healing after alveolar epithelial injury, while M2 macrophages are designated to resolve wound healing processes or terminate inflammatory responses in the lung. IPF is a pathological consequence resulted from altered wound healing in response to persistent lung injury. In this review, we intend to summarize the current state of knowledge regarding the process of macrophage polarization and its mediators in the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis. Our goal is to update the understanding of the mechanisms underlying the initiation and progression of IPF, and by which, we expect to provide help for developing effective therapeutic strategies in clinical settings.