Actin-binding proteins are proteins that could bind to actin or actin fibers. As a member of actin-binding proteins, Transgelin-2 is expressed in smooth muscle cells and non-smooth muscle cells, and its gene, TAGLN2, is differently expressed in all cells and tissues. The deregulation of Transgelin-2 is considered to be correlated with progression of many kinds of diseases, especially the development of malignant tumors, such as invasion, metastasis, and resistance, yet the function and mechanism of action of Transgelin-2 remain elusive. Therefore, we reviewed the basic characteristics and function of Transgelin-2 and its biological role in various types of diseases in order to provide the theoretical basis for further research and new perspectives on cancer development.

MDR and tumor migration and invasion are still the main obstacles to effective breast cancer chemotherapies. Transgelin 2 has recently been shown to induce drug resistance, tumor migration, and invasion. The aim of this study was to determine the biological functions of Transgelin 2 and the mechanism underlying how Transgelin 2 induces paclitaxel (PTX) resistance and the migration and invasion of breast cancer. We detected that the protein level of Transgelin 2 was significantly upregulated in breast cancer tissues compared with adjacent nontumor tissues. A bioinformatics analysis indicated that Transgelin 2 was significantly related to clinicopathologic parameters and patient prognosis. Overexpression of Transgelin 2 enhanced the migration and invasion of human breast cancer cells and decreased the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to paclitaxel. Meanwhile, the tumorigenesis and metastasis of breast cancer cells were also enhanced by Transgelin 2 overexpression in vivo. Moreover, Transgelin 2 overexpression activated the PI3K/Akt/GSK-3b pathway by increasing the phosphorylation levels of Akt and GSK-3b and decreasing the expression of PTEN. We also found that Transgelin 2 could directly interact with PTEN and was located upstream of PTEN. Furthermore, the PI3K/Akt pathway inhibitor MK-2206 reversed the resistance to paclitaxel and inhibited the migration and invasion of breast cancer cells. These findings indicate that Transgelin 2 promotes paclitaxel resistance and the migration and invasion of breast cancer by directly interacting with PTEN and activating the PI3K/Akt/GSK-3b pathway. Transgelin 2 may therefore be useful as a novel biomarker and therapeutic target for breast cancer.

BackgroundPosaconazole therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is increasingly used in clinical practice. However, the utility of posaconazole TDM and the target of posaconazole plasma concentration for clinical successful prophylaxis remain uncertain and controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate posaconazole exposure-response relationship and determine an optimum posaconazole concentration for prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections (IFIs).MethodsBibliographic databases were searched (from inception to September 2017) to select studies including the clinical outcomes below and above concentration cut-off value of 0.5 mg/L and 0.7 mg/L. The reliability of the results were evaluated with trial sequential analysis (TSA).ResultsTwenty-eight studies with 1930 patients included were analyzed. The results of our pooled analysis demonstrated that patients with posaconazole plasma concentrations over 0.5 mg/L were twice more likely to achieve successful responses compared with those with lower concentrations (odds ratio, OR = 1.98, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.09–3.58, P = 0.02) while the threshold, 0.7 mg/L showed no significant difference (OR = 1.84, 95% CI 0.94–3.63, P = 0.08). The TSA results showed that there was sufficient information to support these findings.ConclusionsAn optimal posaconazole concentration target of 0.5 mg/L is suggested to ensure the clinical prophylactic efficacy and may help reduce the dosage and dose-dependent toxicity comparing with the target of 0.7 mg/L.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-018-3055-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background Infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ( MRSA) cause serious health risks and significant economic burdens and the preferred drugs are still controversial. Methods We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy and safety of antibiotics used to treat inpatients with complicated skin and soft structure infections (cSSSI) or hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP). We also developed a decision tree model to assess the cost-effectiveness of antibiotics. Results Forty-nine randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria (34 for cSSSI, 15 for HAP/VAP) and compared the efficacy and safety of 16 antibiotics. For cSSSI, NMA indicated that for clinical cure, linezolid was superior than vancomycin (odds ratio (OR) 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19–2.02), while tedizolid (OR 1.39, CI 0.70–2.76) was similar to vancomycin. In terms of safety, there were no significant differences between any two interventions on total adverse events. Based on drug and hospital costs in America, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per life-year saved for linezolid and tedizolid compared with vancomycin were US$2833 and US$5523. For HAP/VAP, there were no significant effects either for clinical cure or for safety endpoints between linezolid and vancomycin in NMA. ICERs per life-year saved for linezolid compared with vancomycin were US$2185. Conclusion In these clinical trials, considering efficacy, safety, and cost-effectivenes, linezolid and tedizolid showed their superiority in MRSA cSSSI; while linezolid might be recommended to treat MRSA pneumonia. Although vancomycin was not cost-effective in pharmacoeconomic evaluation, it is still the first-line treatment for MRSA infection in the clinical practice. This study might provide new insights of therapeutic choices for patients with MRSA infections whilst awaiting the arrival of higher quality evidence. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13756-019-0518-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

BackgroundNucleophosmin is a non-ribosomal nucleolar phosphoprotein that is found primarily in the nucleolus region of cell nucleus, plays multiple important roles in tumor processes. Accumulated previous studies have reported a potential value of NPM acted as a biomarker for prognosis in various solid tumors, but the results were more inconsistency. We performed this meta-analysis to precisely evaluate the prognostic significance of NPM in solid tumors.MethodsClinical data were collected from a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases (up to October, 2017). A total of 11 studied with 997 patients were used to assess the association of NPM expression and patients’ overall survival (OS). The hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to estimate the effect.ResultsThe pooled results indicated that higher expression of NPM was observably correlated with poor OS in solid tumor (HR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.44–2.38, P < 0.001). Furthermore, high expression of NPM was associated with some phenotypes of tumor aggressiveness, such as tumor stage (4 studies, III/IV vs. I/II, OR = 5.21, 95% CI: 2.72–9.56, P < 0.001), differentiation grade (poor vs. well/moderate, OR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.01–3.27, P = 0.046).ConclusionThis meta-analysis indicated that NPM may act as a valuable prognosis biomarker and a potential therapeutic target in human solid tumors.