Next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a non-invasive method to guide therapy selection for cancer patients. ctDNA variant allele frequency (VAF) is commonly reported and may aid in discerning whether a variant is germline or somatic. We report on the fidelity of VAF in ctDNA as a predictor for germline variant carriage. Two patient cohorts were studied. Cohort 1 included patients with known germline variants. Cohort 2 included patients with any variant detected by the ctDNA assay with VAF of 40–60%. In cohort 1, 36 of 91 (40%) known germline variants were identified through ctDNA analysis with a VAF of 39–87.6%. In cohort 2, 111 of 160 (69%) variants identified by ctDNA analysis with a VAF between 40 and 60% were found to be germline. Therefore, variants with a VAF between 40 and 60% should induce suspicion for germline status but should not be used as a replacement for germline testing.

PURPOSE Identification of incidental germline mutations in the context of next-generation sequencing is an unintended consequence of advancing technologies. These data are critical for family members to understand disease risks and take action. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of 1,028 adult patients with metastatic cancer who were sequenced with tumor and germline whole exome sequencing (WES). Germline variant call files were mined for pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants using the ClinVar database and narrowed to high-quality submitters. RESULTS Median age was 59 years, with 16% of patients ≤ 45 years old. The most common tumor types were breast cancer (12.5%), colorectal cancer (11.5%), sarcoma (9.3%), prostate cancer (8.4%), and lung cancer (6.6%). We identified 3,427 P/LP variants in 471 genes, and 84% of patients harbored one or more variant. One hundred thirty-two patients (12.8%) carried a P/LP variant in a cancer predisposition gene, with BRCA2 being the most common (1.6%). Patients with breast cancer were most likely to carry a P/LP variant (19.2%). One hundred ten patients (10.7%) carried a P/LP variant in a gene that would be recommended by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics to be reported as a result of clinical actionability, with the most common being ATP7B (2.7%), BRCA2 (1.6%), MUTYH (1.4%), and BRCA1 (1%). Of patients who carried a P/LP variant in a cancer predisposition gene, only 53% would have been offered correct testing based on current clinical practice guidelines. Of 471 mutated genes, 231 genes had a P/LP variant identified in one patient, demonstrating significant genetic heterogeneity. CONCLUSION The majority of patients undergoing clinical cancer WES harbor a pathogenic germline variation. Identification of clinically actionable germline findings will create additional burden on oncology clinics as broader WES becomes common.

In the era of precision medicine, genomic interrogation for identification of both germline and somatic genetic alterations has become increasingly important. While such germline testing was usually undertaken via a phenotype-driven single-gene approach, with the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, the widespread utilization of multigene panels, often agnostic of cancer phenotype, has become a commonplace in many different cancer types. At the same time, somatic tumor testing in oncology performed for the purpose of guiding therapeutic decisions for targeted therapies has also rapidly expanded, recently starting to incorporate not just patients with recurrent or metastatic cancer but even patients with early-stage disease. An integrated approach may be the best approach for the optimal management of patients with different cancers. The lack of complete congruence between germline and somatic NGS tests does not minimize the power or importance of either, but highlights the need to understand their limitations so as not to overlook an important finding or omission. NGS tests built to more uniformly and comprehensively evaluate both the germline and tumor simultaneously are urgently required and are in development. In this article, we discuss approaches to somatic and germline analyses in patients with cancer and the knowledge gained from integration of tumor-normal sequencing. We also detail strategies for the incorporation of genomic analysis into oncology care delivery models and the important emergence of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and other DNA Damage Response inhibitors in the clinic for patients with cancer with germline and somatic BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.