Objectives: A total of 30% to 40% of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients develop major wound complications (MWCs) after preoperative radiation (preRT). The optimal preRT-surgery interval and its association with MWCs is unknown. This study investigated whether a longer preRT-surgery interval is associated with fewer MWCs compared with historical controls. Methods: All patients treated by a single surgeon after preRT with limb-sparing wide resection for extremity and trunk STS were retrospectively reviewed from 2004 to 2014. The primary outcome was MWCs defined as a secondary operation, invasive procedure, wound packing, or readmission for wound care. Secondary outcomes of local recurrence and survival were followed and independent variables were analyzed for an association with MWCs. Results: Fifty-four patients were included with a median follow-up of 32 months and age of 61 years. The majority of tumors were deep (91%), large (median size of 11 cm), high grade (78%) and within the lower extremity (78%). The median preRT-surgery interval was 43 days and 80% of patients received surgery 35 to 49 days after radiation. MWCs were observed in 15% of patients and 88% occurred within 40 days. Predictors for MWCs on multivariate analysis were peripheral vascular disease (P=0.03), location in the medial compartment of the thigh (P=0.03), and neurovascular involvement (P=0.03). Conclusions: This study presents a cohort of STS patients with an extended preRT-surgery interval of ~6 weeks. MWCs in this population occurred at a lower rate than historical controls. Overall these findings support the exploration of a longer interval to reduce MWCs and their associated morbidity.

Purpose: To determine whether surgeon specialty affects complications after open operative care of distal upper-extremity fractures. Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Database from 2005 to 2016. Patients were included if they received open operative treatment by an orthopedic or a plastic surgeon for distal radius/ulna, carpal, metacarpal, or phalangeal fracture. Univariate analysis and multivariable analysis of perioperative complications were performed to identify differences between the 2 specialties. Major complications assessed were 30-day reoperation and mortality. We also assessed transfusion, thromboembolic, surgical site infections, cardiac, pulmonary, and renal complications. Results: A total of 20,512 patients were included. Most cases performed by orthopedic surgeons (71.2%) were for distal radius/ulna fractures, whereas the majority of cases performed by plastic surgeons were for metacarpal (41.0%) and phalangeal (37.9%) fractures. No difference was identified in most perioperative complications between specialties. Plastic surgeons had a higher incidence of surgical site infections (1.2% vs 0.5%) on univariate analysis. However, when controlling for variables such as patient demographics and comorbidities in multivariable analysis, surgical specialty was not significantly associated with surgical site infection. Rather, surgery on phalangeal bones (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] ¼ 2.745; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.559e4.833), higher wound class (wound class 3 aOR ¼ 3.630; 95% CI, 2.003e6.577), and smoking (aOR ¼ 1.970; 95% CI,1.279e3.032) were independent risk factors for surgical site infection. Plastic surgeons were found to operate on proportionally more smokers, patients with higher wound class, and phalangeal fractures (37.9% of all fracture cases) compared with orthopedic surgeons Conclusions: Orthopedic and plastic surgeons achieve equivalent outcomes from a safety perspective after open operative treatment of upper-extremity fractures in terms of mortality and 30-day reoperation, which suggests that both specialties can safely perform call-related operative upper-extremity fracture care. Plastic surgeons operated on more smokers, patients with higher wound class, and phalangeal fractures, all of which were associated with increased incidence of surgical site infection, revealing differences in practice composition from their orthopedic colleagues. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic III.

Background: While the influences of acetabular dysplasia and overcoverage on hip arthritis have been studied, the impact of femoral neck-shaft angle on hip arthritis is much more poorly understood. The purpose of this study is to determine if a relationship exists between neck shaft angle and the development of osteoarthritis, a better understanding of which would be useful to surgeons planning osteotomies about the hip. Methods: 533 cadaveric femora and acetabulae (1066 total) from the Hamann-Todd Osteological Collection (Cleveland, OH) were acquired. We measured true neck shaft angle using an AP photograph with the femoral neck parallel to the table. Femoral head volume to acetabular volume ratio, representing femoral head coverage, as well as femoral version were utilised. Correlation between neck shaft angle, femoral version, femoral head coverage and osteoarthritis were evaluated with multiple regression analysis. Results: The mean age and standard deviation was 56 ± 10 years. There were 64 females (12%) and 469 males. There were 380 Caucasians (71%) and 153 African-Americans. Mean femoral version was 11° ± 12° and mean true neck shaft angle was 127.7° ± 5.9° There was a strong correlation between age and arthritis (standardised beta 0.488, p < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between increasing true neck shaft angle and decreasing hip arthritis (standardised beta -0.024, p = 0.038). In the femoral head overcoverage subset, increasing true neck shaft angle was still significantly associated with decreasing hip arthritis (standardised beta −0.088, p = 0.018), although this relationship was not significant with femoral head undercoverage subset. Conclusions: With sufficient acetabular coverage, a relative increase in femoral neck shaft angle within the physiologic range is associated with decreased hip osteoarthritis. Clinical relevance: An understanding of the relationship between femoral neck shaft angle and hip osteoarthritis could be useful for surgeons planning pelvic or proximal femur osteotomies in children.