ObjectiveLonger intervals between routine clinic visits and medication refills are part of patient-centred, differentiated service delivery (DSD). They have been shown to improve patient outcomes as well as optimise health services—vital as ‘universal test-and-treat’ targets increase numbers of HIV patients on antiretroviral treatment (ART). This qualitative study explored patient, healthcare worker and key informant experiences and perceptions of extending ART refills to 6 months in adherence clubs in Khayelitsha, South Africa.Design and settingIn-depth interviews were conducted in isiXhosa with purposively selected patients and in English with healthcare workers and key informants. All transcripts were audio-recorded, transcribed and translated to English, manually coded and thematically analysed. The participants had been involved in a randomised controlled trial evaluating multi-month ART dispensing in adherence clubs, comparing 6-month and 2-month refills.ParticipantsTwenty-three patients, seven healthcare workers and six key informants.ResultsPatients found that 6-month refills increased convenience and reduced unintended disclosure. Contrary to key informant concerns about patients’ responsibility to manage larger quantities of ART, patients receiving 6-month refills were highly motivated and did not face challenges transporting, storing or adhering to treatment. All participant groups suggested that strict eligibility criteria were necessary for patients to realise the benefits of extended dispensing intervals. Six-month refills were felt to increase health system efficiency, but there were concerns about whether the existing drug supply system could adapt to 6-month refills on a larger scale.ConclusionsPatients, healthcare workers and key informants found 6-month refills within adherence clubs acceptable and beneficial, but concerns were raised about the reliability of the supply chain to manage extended multi-month dispensing. Stepwise, slow expansion could avoid overstressing supply and allow time for the health system to adapt, permitting 6-month ART refills to enhance current DSD options to be more efficient and patient-centred within current health system constraints.

No abstract

BackgroundDaily directly-observed therapy (DOT) is recommended for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) patients throughout treatment. We assessed the impact of self-administered treatment (SAT) in a South African township with high rates of RR-TB and HIV.MethodsCommunity-supported SAT for patients who completed the intensive phase was piloted in five primary care clinics in Khayelitsha. We compared final treatment outcomes among RR-TB patients initiating treatment before (standard-of-care (SOC)-cohort, January 2010-July 2013) and after the implementation of the pilot (SAT-cohort, January 2012-December 2014). All patients with outcomes before January 1, 2017 were considered in the analysis of outcomes.ResultsOne-hundred-eighteen patients in the SOC-cohort and 174 patients in the SAT-cohort had final RR-TB treatment outcomes; 70% and 73% were HIV-co-infected, respectively. The proportion of patients with a final outcome of loss to follow-up (LTFU) did not differ whether treated in the SOC (25/118, 21.2%) or SAT-cohort (31/174, 17.8%) (P = 0.47). There were no significant differences in the time to 24-month LTFU among HIV-infected and uninfected patients (HR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.51–1.6, P = 0.71), or among patients enrolled in the SOC-cohort versus the SAT-cohort (HR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.49–1.4, P = 0.50) who received at least 6-months of RR-TB treatment.ConclusionThe introduction of SAT during the continuation phase of RR-TB treatment does not adversely affect final RR-TB treatment outcomes in a high TB and HIV-burden setting. This differentiated, patient-centred model of care could be considered in RR-TB programmes to decrease the burden of DOT on patients and health facilities.

An intervention based on early tracing of patients who interrupt treatment, peer-delivered counselling and individualised management plans by a multidisciplinary team was considered a beneficial and acceptable model to support patients at risk of LTFU from DR-TB treatment.

Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB), defined as TB with at least rifampicin resistance, is increasing in prevalence and incidence worldwide. [1] South Africa (SA) has reported some of the highest numbers of DR-TB cases globally: in 2012 alone there were 14 161 laboratorynotified cases of multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) and 1 545 cases of extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB). [2] Regimens available for DR-TB are expensive, toxic, and require a minimum treatment duration of 20 months. In addition, currently available medications often cause multiple side-effects that impact on patients' ability to maintain their usual daily activities. [3] The burden of treatment regimens contributes to poor DR-TB programme outcomes, including high rates of loss from treatment (LFT) and stagnant treatment success rates. A study conducted in the Western Cape Province, SA, found an LFT rate of 27%, which is comparable to LFT rates observed in other DR-TB treatment cohorts in SA. [4] National Department of Health (NDoH) data from 2012 reflect a 40% treatment success rate for MDR-TB and less than 20% treatment success for XDR-TB. [2] It is imperative that strategies to provide structured patient support are developed and implemented to promote retention in care. Setting Khayelitsha, a township in the Western Cape, is home to approximately 500 000 people and has one of the highest rates of