The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has endorsed Critical Congenital Heart Disease (CCHD) screening using pulse oximetry nationwide, but, however, acknowledges that altitude may impact failure rates and alternative algorithms may be required at high altitudes. We therefore evaluated a modified screening protocol at an altitude of 6200 feet with the hypothesis that modifications could decrease failure rates. We evaluated 2001 well, newborn infants ě35 weeks gestation using a modified protocol, which included a lower saturation cutoff for the first screen (85% instead of the AAP recommended 90%) and an oxygen hood intervention between the first two screens. Using our modified screening algorithm, we found a 0.3% failure rate, which was similar to the 0.2% sea-level rate and statistically different from the 1.1% rate identified in a recent study at similar altitude. Had the AAP protocol been used, the failure rate would have increased to 0.8%, which is similar to prior reports near this altitude. Echocardiograms were performed on failing newborns with no CCHD identified. A Birth Defects Registry Database review demonstrated one newborn with CCHD was missed after meeting AAP passing criteria. Overall, this study demonstrates that an alternative algorithm can be implemented at moderate altitude with decreased failure rate and comparable false negative rate.
Introduction: Prenatal studies and postnatal physical exam leave 13- 55% of neonates with CCHD undiagnosed leading to presentation in extremis or death. The AHA has endorsed newborn pulse oximetry screening to capture these infants prior to hospital discharge. Moderate altitude can impart higher screening failure rates. We therefore evaluated a modified CCHD screening protocol in an attempt to reduce false positive screenings at a moderate altitude of 6200 feet (1890 m). Methods: We prospectively enlisted well newborn infants greater than 35 weeks. Near 24 hours of life, trained nursing staff performed pulse oximetry on the right hand and either foot. Those with saturations ≤95% with < 3% difference between hand and foot measurements passed. Infants with saturations <86% failed. Infants with saturations between 86-94% or >3% difference in saturations were placed in an oxygen hood with FiO2 designed to replicate sea level atmospheric oxygen tension for 20 minutes to accelerate neonatal transition. These infants were tested again up to 2 additional screens in room air with standard sea level protocol. Providers were notified and echocardiograms ordered for all infants deemed to have failed. Results: A total of 2005 infants completed the protocol. The failure rate was 0.3% (7/2005), which was not different from the sea level rate of 0.2%. Sea level CCHD screening criteria would have given a failure rate of 0.75%. An additional 2.1% (42/2005) had incomplete screening and were not passing at the time the test was stopped. We found 5/7 (71.4%) infants failed secondary to low saturations, 1/7 (14.3%) failed secondary differential saturations, and 1 infant failed for multiple reasons. Three of the seven infants with failing screens were discharged prior to echocardiogram. None of the infants receiving echocardiograms had critical congenital heart disease. Conclusions: We found a failure rate of 0.3% using an alternate algorithm adjusted for altitude. This failure rate approximates the overall screening failures reported at sea level and is significantly lower than prior reports at altitude. Additional research is needed specifically addressing sensitivity and positive predictive value for screening at moderate altitudes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.