Evidence suggests that brushing with a toothpaste may slow plaque reformation over 24 h. This study measured the effect of toothpaste alone on plaque regrowth over a 96 h period and compared the effect with water and the known antiplaque agent chlorhexidine. At 9 a.m. at the beginning of 7,4‐day no oral hygiene periods, 10 volunteers were scaled and polished. Al 5 p.m. subjects brushed their own teeth with water until plaque free. Each subject rinsed for I min with 10 ml of a randomly allocated rinse. Rinsing was repeated at 10 a.m. and 10 p.m. on subsequent days. The rinses were water, chlorhexidine 0.2% or 3 g/10 ml slurries of toothpastes containing (1) monofluorophosphate(MFP), (2) monofluorophosphate + sodium fluoride (MFP+NaF) (3) monofluorophosphate + zinc citrate (MFP+ZCT) (4) stannous fluoride (SnF2) (5) sodium fluoride (NaF). At 16, 24, 48 and 72 h plaque on the buccal surface of the upper and lower premolars, canines and incisors was scored by the Gingival Margin Plaque Index (GMPI) and gram films of plaque samples made. At 96 h plaque was recorded diagraromatically and areas of coverage measured visually (Debris Index) and by planimetry. Progressive plaque formation to a Gingival Margin Plaque Index of 100% at 72 h was observed for toothpaste and water rinses. For chlorhexidine the Gingival Margin Plaque Index at 72 h was 6%, At 96 h plaque areas were significantly less with toothpaste rinses compared with water. Chlorhexidine very significantly reduced plaque areas compared with toothpaste and water. The bacteriological assessment of smears revealed essentially similar plaque development during toothpaste and water rinses and was consistent with previous reports. However, with chlorhexidine the densities of organisms in the smears were greatly reduced. It was concluded that the small effect of toothpaste rinses on plaque accumulation compared with chlorhexidine would not alone represent a true antiplaque effect resulting in therapeutic benefit.

Level IV.

Level IV, case series.

Level III, retrospective comparative.

Purpose Controversy exists regarding approach to treatment of pediatric patients with fibrous dysplasia. Methods We retrospectively reviewed medical records of seven patients who were treated at our institution for fibrous dysplasia by intramedullary rod fixation without bisphosphonate supplementation. Results Seven patients with a total of ten fibrous dysplasia lesion sites surgically treated by intramedullary rod fixation were included. Of these ten lesion sites, eight demonstrated pathologic fracture at the time of fixation. Complete fracture healing was observed in all eight sites, with no incidence of recurrent pathologic fractures examined radiographically. There were no major infections or neurologic deficits, and lesions appeared to stabilize. Conclusions In this series, intramedullary rod fixation proved to be successful in treatment of acute pathologic fracture and incompletely healed fibrous dysplasia lesions. We observed partial resolution of fibrous dysplasia lesions at all ten sites without significant long-term complications. Following treatment, there were no refractures. Level of evidence Level IV, case series.