Background The evidence of using JAK inhibitors among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is conflicting. The systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to address the efficacy of Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitors in reducing risk of mortality among hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Methods Several electronic databases, including PubMed, EuropePMC, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, with relevant keywords “COVID-19″ AND (“JAK inhibitor” OR “Ruxolitinib” OR “Tofacitinib” OR “Fedratinib” OR “Baricitinib”) AND (“Severe” OR “Mortality”), were used to perform a systematic literature search up to December 11, 2020. All studies pertinent to the predetermined eligibility criteria were included in the analysis. Our outcome of interest was all types of mortality, clinical improvement, and clinical deterioration. Dichotomous variables of our outcomes of interest were analyzed using Maentel-Haenszel formula to obtain odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with random-effects modeling regardless of heterogeneity. Results Five studies with a total of 1190 patients and were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The use of JAK inhibitors was associated with a reduced risk of mortality (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28–0.93, P = 0.02; I 2 : 7.8%, P = 0.354) and clinical improvement (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.05–2.95, P = 0.032; I 2 : 26.4%, P = 0.253). The use of JAK inhibitors was not associated with a reduced risk of clinical deterioration (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.28–1.19, P = 0.136; I 2 : 24.1%, P = 0.267). Conclusion The use of JAK inhibitors was significantly associated with a reduced risk of mortality, and clinical improvement in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Background. Immunocompromised patients are at a higher risk of having latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) has been proven to perform effectively in LTBI detection among immunocompromised adults and can overcome the limitations of the tuberculin skin test (TST). However, the role of QFT-Plus in detecting LTBI in immunocompromised paediatric patients has not been well established. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the test agreement between QFT-Plus and the TST in LTBI detection among immunocompromised children. Method. In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled immunocompromised paediatric patients, aged between 5 and 18 years, who were treated with corticosteroids and/or chemotherapy from June to November 2019. We categorized them into three groups based on the following diseases: hematologic malignancies and nephrological and immunological diseases. We recorded the patient characteristics and QFT-Plus and TST results, in which the positive result of the TST was induration≥5 mm. Within the same group, comparisons between the two tests were performed using the McNemar test, and results were statistically significant for p values of <0.05. The kappa index was used to assess the agreement between the two test results. Results. Among 71 patients (median age: 11.8 years) who underwent TST and QFT-Plus testing, 52% were females, and 69% had a normal nutritional status. Chemotherapy was the most common treatment modality for hematologic malignancy compared to other immunosuppressive treatments. The total number of patients with positive QFT-Plus and TST results was 11/71 (15.5%) and 4/71 (5.6%), respectively, among whom 3/11 patients had positive results in both tests, and one patient with positive TST results exhibited a discrepancy, as this was not followed by positive QFT-Plus results. QFT-Plus generated more positive results than the TST in immunocompromised children (McNemar, p=0.039 (p<0.05)). The diagnostic agreement between the tests was fair (K=0.345, 95% CI: 0.05–0.745). Conclusion. QFT-Plus detected LTBI more effectively than the TST in immunocompromised children.

s Background Thalassemia is the most common inherited disease in the world, involving α- or β-globin in red blood cells. Thalassemia cases rank fifth in the list of national catastrophic diseases in Indonesia; however, nationwide screening for thalassemia carriers is not yet mandatory. This study aimed to assess whether blood count metrics, such as the Shine & Lal index (SLI; MCV*MCV*MCH/100), might serve as a predictor to screen thalassemia carriers in a limited resource area where molecular methods are not readily available. Methods During a family gathering of thalassemia patients, family members (n196) underwent a complete blood count test. Those with MCV < 80 fL and/or MCH < 27 pg and/or SLI < 1530 were further examined for Hb analysis. Only samples with HbA2 fraction > 4% or with a peak in the HbE fraction were sequenced to confirm β-globin gene mutations. Results Of 196 family members, 117 (59.6%) had low MCV and/or low MCH and/or low SLI. The HbE fraction (mean 24.06% ± 0.95, range 22.4–26.5) was found in 27 (13.7%) cases, and all had a mutation at codon (CD)26 (c.79G > A). The mean HbA 2 fraction in these samples was 3.18% ± 0.62 (range 2.6–3.8). For samples with HbA2 > 4% (n30; 15.3%), all had mutations at IVS1nt5 (c.92 + 5 G > C; n28), CD8/9 (c.27_28insG; n1) and CD19 (c.59A > G; n1). The mean HbA 2 fraction with a mutation at IVS1nt5 (c.92 + 5 G > C) was 4.65% ± 0.77 (range 4.0–5.6). Interestingly, anaemia was only present in 25 and 57% of β-thalassemia carriers with mutations at CD26 (c.79G > A) and at IVS1nt5 (c.92 + 5 G > C), respectively. Conclusions The Shine & Lal index is helpful in the early screening of β-thalassemia carriers, since this index confirms mutations at CD-26 (c.79G > A) and at IVS1nt5 (c.92 + 5 G > C), which are both common mutations in Bandung, Indonesia. Further DNA analysis is a topic of interest to map variants in globin genes and their distribution across populations.