Background China implemented the national drug price negotiation (NDPN) policy to include 17 innovative anticancer medicines in the national reimbursement drug list in 2018. We aimed to assess the impact of this policy on the utilization, cost, and accessibility of anticancer medicines. MethodsWe obtained monthly medicine procurement data from 1039 hospitals from October 2017 to December 2019. We examined changes in availability, utilization, defined daily dose cost (DDDc), and affordability of the medicines using descriptive statistics and controlled interrupted time series analysis, measuring utilization by defined daily doses (DDDs). Cetuximab and raltitrexed were compared separately for the same indication. ResultsThe mean availability of 17 negotiated anticancer medicines was 28.78% after the NDPN, amounting to an increase of 25.22%. The availability increased by 7.88% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.31%, 11.45%, P < 0.001) immediately and by 1.23% (95% CI = 0.81%, 1.64%, P < 0.001) per month after policy implementation. Compared with the control group, the utilization of the medicines increased by 11.44 DDDs (95% CI = 2.42, 20.46, P = 0.014) immediately and by 3.54 DDDs (95% CI = 2.47, 4.60, P < 0.001) per month after policy implementation, while the DDDc decreased by US$109.09 (95% CI = 68.14, 150.05, P < 0.001) immediately and remained stable thereafter. The results on cetuximab and raltitrexed were similar. Availability and utilization differed among regions in east, middle, and west China. Out-of-pocket costs decreased by 17.35 times the catastrophic health expenditures to 1.99 times, but the affordability ratio for 14 negotiated medicines was still greater than 1. ConclusionsThe NDPN policy improved the availability, utilization, and affordability of anticancer medicines. China's experience in NDPN provides a reference for other countries. However, the availability and affordability of anticancer medicines still need further improvement.Cancer has become a leading cause of death globally, accounting for nearly 10 million deaths, or nearly one in six deaths in 2020 [1]. Among them, lung cancer was the most common cause of cancer death, accounting for 1.80 million. In China, there were 4.57 million new cancer cases, accounting for 23.7% of the cases globally, and three million cancer deaths, accounting for 30% of cancer deaths globally in 2020 [2]. China ranked first in the world in both the number of new cancer cases and cancer deaths, far surpassing other countries in the world. Cancer has become a major problem affecting human health. Simultaneously, cancer treatment expenditures appear to be catastrophic for patients in China [3]. About half of cancer patients borrowed money or went into debt and approximately 10% of cancer patients reported forgoing some medical care because of cost [4]. Many cancer patients cannot afford targeted anticancer medicines -the main cancer treatment [5].

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the price, availability, and affordability of essential medicines in primary healthcare institutions in Jiangsu Province.MethodsA mixed longitudinal and cross-sectional survey was conducted in primary healthcare institutions in Jiangsu based on the adjusted World Health Organization and Health Action International methodology. 45 essential medicines were collected from 30 primary healthcare institutions in Nanjing from 2016 to 2020. We also collected information on these medicines in 70 primary healthcare institutions across seven cities of Jiangsu in 2021. The availability, price, and affordability were compared with matched sets. Differences of availability between years and cities were further compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum test.ResultsIn Nanjing, the variation was significant of availability during the study period. The MPR was generally decreasing between 2016 and 2020, with the median price ratio (MPR) for lowest-priced generics (LPGs) ranging from 1.20 to 2.53 and originator brands (OBs) substantially above international levels. The median availability of generic medicines increased in 2018 and subsequently stabilized at around 55%, and the availability of originator medicines was low. There were no significant regional differences in prices across the sampled cities in Jiangsu, and the median MPR for LPGs was acceptable (1.23), while the median MPR for OBs was 8.54. The mean availability was different across regions (p &lt; 0.001), being higher in Nanjing (54.67%) and Nantong (56.22%), and lower in northern Jiangsu (about 35%). For LPGs, there was little difference in the proportion of medicines with low availability and high affordability (50.00% for urban residents and 40.48% for rural residents). For OBs, there were more than half of rural residents had low availability and low affordability of medicines (58.82%).ConclusionsIn terms of yearly changes, the prices of essential medicines have considerably decreased, and the availability of LPGs has slightly increased. However, the availability of medicines was found to be poor and there were regional differences in the availability and affordability of medicines among metropolitan and rural areas. Policy interventions targeting external factors associated with health resource allocation are essential and possible strategies include effective and efficient government investment mechanisms on primary healthcare.

Ni-rich layered cathodes (NCM) are appealing for advanced Li-ion battery thanks to their high-energy density and tolerable cost. Nevertheless, the unfavorable mechanical disintegration coupled with the parasitic reactions greatly deteriorates...

Background: The overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) gene is present in 20~25% of breast cancer (BC) patients, contributing to an inferior prognosis. Recent clinical trials showed that pyrotinib has promising antitumor activities and acceptable tolerability for those patients (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03080805 and NCT02422199). Therefore, this study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of pyrotinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine for patients with HER2-positive metastatic BC after prior trastuzumab. Methods: A lifetime-partitioned survival model was established to evaluate health and economic outcomes with different treatment strategies. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Data were derived from the published literature, clinical trials, expert opinions, and other local charges. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the findings. Scenario analyses were developed to make further evaluations. Results: The pyrotinib regimen had significant advantages over the lapatinib regimen after enrolling in the National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL), with cost savings of USD 15,599.27 and a gain of 0.53 QALYs. Meanwhile, before enrolling in NRDL, the pyrotinib regimen afforded the same QALYs at a higher incremental cost of USD 45,400.64 versus the lapatinib regimen, producing an ICER of USD 85,944.79 per QALY. Scenario analyses yielded similar results. Sensitivity analyses suggested stability in the cost-effectiveness findings. Conclusions: Compared to lapatinib plus capecitabine, the pyrotinib plus capecitabine enrolled in NRDL is a cost-effective alternative second-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive metastatic BC in China.

Background: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a global chronic disease with increasing prevalence in recent years, particularly CKD accompanied by Secondary Hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) leads to reduced quality of life, increased mortality, a considerable economic burden for patients and society. The aim of this study was to investigate the cost-effectiveness analysis of paricalcitol vs. calcitriol + cinacalcet for CKD patients with SHPT in China in 2020.Methods: A Markov model was conducted employing data derived from published literature, clinical trials, official sources, and tertiary public hospital data in China, based on a 10-year horizon from the perspective of the healthcare system. Calcitriol + Cinacalcet was used as the reference group. CKD stage 5 (CKD-5) dialysis patients suffering from SHPT were included in the study. Effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The discount rate (5%) was applied to costs and effectiveness. Sensitivity analysis was performed to confirm the robustness of the findings.Results: The base case analysis demonstrated that Patients treated with paricalcitol could gain an increase in utility (0.183 QALYs) and require fewer expenditures (6925.612 yuan). One-way sensitivity analysis was performed to showed that impact factors were the price of cinacalcet, the hospitalization costs of patients with paricalcitol and calcitriol, the costs and utilities of hemodialysis and the costs of calcitriol, the costs of paricalcitol regardless of period. Probabilistic simulation analysis displayed when willingness-to-pay was ¥217113, the probability that Paricalcitol was dominant is 96.20%.Conclusion: The results showed that paricalcitol administrated to treat patients diagnosed with Secondary hyperparathyroidism in Chronic Kidney Disease, compared to calcitriol and cinacalcet, might be dominant in China.