Respiratory induced dynamic variations of stroke volume and its surrogates are very sensitive and specific predictors of fluid responsiveness, but their use as targets for volume management can be limited. In a recent study, limiting factors were present in 53 % of surgical patients with inserted arterial line. In the intensive care unit (ICU) population the frequency is presumably higher, but the real prevalence is unknown. Our goal was to study the feasibility of dynamic variations guided initial volume resuscitation in specific critical states. We have performed a 5 year retrospective evaluation of patients admitted with diagnosis sepsis, polytrauma, after high risk surgery or cardiac arrest. Occurrence of major (sedation, mandatory ventilation and tidal volume, open chest and arrhythmias) and minor limiting factors (PEEP level, use of vasopressors and presence of arterial catheter) was screened within the first 24 h after admission. In the study period 1296 patients were hospitalized in our ICU with severe sepsis (n = 242), polytrauma (n = 561), after high risk surgery (n = 351) or cardiac arrest (n = 141). From these patients 549 (42.4 %) fulfilled all major criteria for applicability of dynamic variations. In our evaluation only limited number of patients admitted for polytrauma (51 %), sepsis (37 %), after cardiac arrest (39 %) or surgical procedure (33 %) fulfil all the major criteria for use of dynamic variations at the ICU admission. The prevalence was similar in patients with shock. Occurrence of minor factors can pose further bias in evaluation of these patients. General use of dynamic variations guided protocols for initial resuscitations seems not universally applicable.

BackgroundThe use of goal directed fluid protocols in intermediate risk patients undergoing hip or knee replacement was studied in few trials using invasive monitoring. For this reason we have implemented two different fluid management protocols, both based on a novel totally non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring device and compared them to the standard (no-protocol) treatment applied before the transition in our academic institution.MethodsThree treatment groups were compared in this prospective study: the observational (CONTROL, N = 40) group before adoption of fluid protocols and two randomized groups after the transition to protocol fluid management with the use of the continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring (CNAP®) device. In the PRESSURE group (N = 40) standard variables were used for restrictive fluid therapy. Goal directed fluid therapy using pulse pressure variation was used in the GDFT arm (N = 40). The influence on the rate of postoperative complications, on the hospital length of stay and other parameters was assessed.ResultsBoth protocols were associated with decreased fluid administration and maintained hemodynamic stability. Reduced rate of postoperative infection and organ complications (22 (55 %) vs. 33 (83 %) patients; p = 0.016; relative risk 0.67 (0.49–0.91)) was observed in the GDFT group compared to CONTROL. Lower number of patients receiving transfusion (4 (10 %) in GDFT vs. 17 (43 %) in CONTROL; p = 0.005) might contribute to this observation. No significant differences were observed in other end-points.ConclusionIn our study, the use of the fluid protocol based on pulse pressure variation assessed using continuous non-invasive arterial pressure measurement seems to be associated with a reduction in postoperative complications and transfusion needs as compared to standard no-protocol treatment.Trial registrationACTRN12612001014842Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12871-015-0131-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background: In clinical medicine, little is known about the use of allografts for portal vein (PV) reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Portal and caval systems are physiologically different, therefore the properties of allografts from caval and portal systems were studied here in a pig model. Materials and Methods: PD with PV reconstruction with allogeneic venous graft from PV or inferior vena cava (IVC) was performed in 26 pigs. Biochemical analysis and ultrasonography measurements were performed during a 4-week monitoring period. Computer simulations were used to evaluate haemodynamics in reconstructed PV and explanted allografts were histologically examined. Results: The native PV and IVC grafts varied in histological structure but were able to adapt morphologically after transplantation. Computer simulation suggested PV grafts to be more susceptible to thrombosis development. Thrombosis of reconstructed PV occurred in four out of five cases in PV group. Conclusion: This study supports the use of allografts from caval system for PV reconstruction in clinical medicine when needed.Pancreatic cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer mortality in developed countries; its incidence has been rising over last decades and without a breakthrough in therapy this trend is expected to continue (1, 2). The incidence of pancreatic cancer is almost equal to its mortality rate and the estimated 5-year survival rate is only 5% (1, 3).Nowadays the only potential curative therapy of this disease is radical surgical resection, which can help to increase the 5year survival rate up to 25% (4). The standard surgical method for curative resection of tumours arising in the head of the pancreas is pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) (5). However, the resectability of pancreatic cancer is limited by vessel infiltration. In the presence of tumour ingrowth into adjacent arteries, surgical resection is not generally recommended due to high postoperative morbidity and mortality (4, 6). However, tumours infiltrating venous structures [such as the superior mesenteric vein (SMV), and portal vein (PV)] can be safely resected together with involved part of the vein, resulting in morbidity and mortality comparable with standard PPPD (4, 7).Resection of either PV or SMV during PPPD requires a suitable reconstruction of the involved vessel. In cases when only a tangential resection or short segmental resection is performed, the vein can be reconstructed by venorrhaphy, patch plasty or primary anastomosis. When a longer venous 6603

No abstract